snip
In a SOA application, your spring perch is underneath the shortest leaves of the spring pack. Thus, longer spring perches will have little, to no, impact on minimizing the deformation of the upper leaf/leaves caused by axle wrap. Which is why SUA vehicles are less susceptible to axle wrap.
end snip...
Actually, this isn't *entirely* accurate.
True, longer perches will not make as much difference as a traction (or anti-wrap) bar will. However, all things being equal, i'd go for the longer, square tube shackles rather than the dodge perches.
Here's why.
When we did the SO on my 40, we used con-ferr (i think - this was about 6 years ago) spring pads, and i remember thinking that they were awfully small. I also had some trouble with axle wrap.
So, when we did the SO on my 60, we made our own out of square tube, and made them about 2 1/2 longer than stock.
So, my perches in the rear extend about 1 1/4" further on each side than the orginal.
So the question is: Does this prevent axle wrap. Well, i haven't had any trouble yet and I haven't found a good design or any need for a traction bar yet. I suspect when i finally break something, i'll have found the need.
More than axle wrap, to me the larger pads help spread the load better. Which equates to better stability, etc, especially with a 60. With a 40 being so much lighter in the rear, i can't see how it wouldn't be a good thing.
Just my .02, not disagreeing, just offering another perspective based on personal experience.
Rob