SM420 Pilot Bearing ?'s

Joined
Mar 27, 2003
Messages
6,266
Location
Georgia Tech
Visit site
Ok guys, I'm getting closer and closer to getting the 420 in there, but I have one question. Charlie (pinhead) outlines a procedure to make an adapter for the pilot bearing on an SM420. He offhand mentions that this is only necessary if you do not buy an adapter. On Mike Smythes' site he mentions a bearing needed "for Warden's pilot adapter." Is this Warden's pilot adapter what PH is referring to? and if so where do I get one? (I don't trust my fab skills, I need to save time, (school starts waaaay too soon) and I recently had a pilot bearing failure while on the trail and its NOT fun).
Or maybe I'm way off here and someone needs to smack me? ??? (I did have another soccer practice today :eek: )
Any ideas from those of you that have done the swap?
Maybe some invaluable wisdom from Mike or Charlie themselves?
 

73lndcrsr

SILVER Star
Joined
May 28, 2002
Messages
772
Visit site
There are several adapters that are required. You need to pilot bearing sleave, To bearing sleave and the index ring for the bellhousing. You can get these in a nice kit from extreme bends. The GM pilot bearing # is 14061685. You can get it from NAPA - about $13. I am just starting my conversion, so if I run into issues I will let you know.
 
Joined
Mar 27, 2003
Messages
6,266
Location
Georgia Tech
Visit site
Wait what are these items:
"You need to pilot bearing sleave, To bearing sleave"
I need a pilot bearing sleave and what?
and both of these are included in the hardware kit at extremebends? Sorry if I'm being difficult I just want to be sure this is what I need before I drop $100 CDN on the kit.
 

73lndcrsr

SILVER Star
Joined
May 28, 2002
Messages
772
Visit site
My understanding is there is a sleeve for the throwout bearing (The tall sleeve in the picture) and a pilot bearing sleeve that gets tapped into the crank.
 
Joined
Mar 27, 2003
Messages
6,266
Location
Georgia Tech
Visit site
Ok one more question:
Where did you get the GM pilot bearing? I tried my Napa today, but the guy (who is pretty knowledgable) said that he can't cross the number, but if I give him a I.D. and O.D. he said he may be able to find one that will work.
Thanks a ton.
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2002
Messages
15,296
Location
OC, CA
Visit site
The adaptor I show in the write up is for the throw out bearing, not the pilot bearing. I used the pilot bearing from Classic Cruisers. At about $27, it is a bargain for a sealed bearing with no adaptor required.
 

73lndcrsr

SILVER Star
Joined
May 28, 2002
Messages
772
Visit site
The Napa number for the pilot bearing (BK 615-1049) They list it as a bushing.

Pinhead,
Do you happen to have a picture of the classis cruisers bearing you referenced?
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2002
Messages
15,296
Location
OC, CA
Visit site
No, I don't have a picture but it is easy to visualize. It is just like the stock Toyota bearing, except the inner race is 3/8 inch wider on the side facing the rear.
 
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
8
Visit site
where does the part# 202RRE come from? and where can I get the discontinued bearing retainer from AA. The '72 I'm workn' on - someone grinded the stock 420 retainer. It would be sooo convenient to slap a new machined one on.
 
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
8
Visit site
Received my 202RRE's today. whoever took the time to cross reference this part is a genius! NOW, to make no doubt, does the long side of the inner race point toward the crank ?
 

Poser

Oh...Durka Durka Durka.
Supporting Vendor
Joined
Oct 1, 2003
Messages
20,456
Location
MN
Visit site
So the flywheel is in and the new fasteners are torqued. Before installing the pilot bearing, I always make sure that it is a slip-fit on the end of the transmission input shaft so as to avoid any binding while installing the transmission into the clutch and flywheel housing. I just use a piece of emery cloth and lightly sand down the input shaft.
After the pilot bearing is a slip fit on the input shaft, it is then installed into the end of the crank shaft. After it is seated, I put a dab of anti-seize in the center of the pilot bearing where the input shaft will be touching it.



From the FAQ




Received my 202RRE's today. whoever took the time to cross reference this part is a genius! NOW, to make no doubt, does the long side of the inner race point toward the crank ?


The ‘long side of the inner race’ would be orientated towards the transmission and not the crankshaft.

Be sure to fit that bearing to your input shaft of the transmission before you install it into the crankshaft.
ip02.jpg
ip03.jpg
ip04.jpg
 
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
8
Visit site
Got it, I'm glad I didn't proceed any further. My thinking was to have more of the bearing around the shaft and use the inner race as the spacer needed, hence the 3/8" space to be filled. But the excess should be toward the 420. Another Q: what is your opinion with someone grinding the stock 420 retainer to fit the stock '40 throwout sleeve?
 

Cruiserdrew

On the way there
SILVER Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2003
Messages
15,926
Location
Sacramento, CA
Visit site
Another Q: what is your opinion with someone grinding the stock 420 retainer to fit the stock '40 throwout sleeve?


Seems like a very bad idea. I think you have it backwards. The retainer is smaller in diameter than the 40s throw out sleeve. It's been a long time since I did this, but you need to make the retainer nose bigger in diameter by shimming with a bit of pipe.
 

Mace

rock scientist..
Staff member
s-Moderator
Joined
Feb 17, 2002
Messages
21,631
Location
Las Vegas
Visit site
Seems like a very bad idea. I think you have it backwards. The retainer is smaller in diameter than the 40s throw out sleeve. It's been a long time since I did this, but you need to make the retainer nose bigger in diameter by shimming with a bit of pipe.

Correct..

And I used a Pilot bushing instead of a bearing. Never noticed the difference.
 
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
8
Visit site
Waaait a minute, the 420 retainer has to be modified to fit into the throwout bearing sleeve and from seeing AA's conversion piece (now discontinued) it looks shallow-er than stock. Maybe I'm not explaining it correctly but I do know there are so many different ways its been done
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom