Range for compression on 2f

Discussion in '60-Series Wagons' started by Liam, Jul 28, 2005.

  1. Liam

    Liam

    Messages:
    4,548
    Media:
    31
    Albums:
    4
    Likes Received:
    13
    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Location:
    in the nappy dugout
    Just got my test results back on my 87 FJ60. Dont have the exact numbers on the cylinders but the mechanic said they were between 131 and 135.

    Is this good for an engine with 143K?? What should be the range (high/low)?
     
  2. Doc

    Doc

    Messages:
    5,925
    Media:
    33
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    420
    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2004
    Location:
    Utah
    Dude, that's way WAY W A Y low. I'll give you $2.5K for it.


    :)


    I have no idea.
     
  3. Liam

    Liam

    Messages:
    4,548
    Media:
    31
    Albums:
    4
    Likes Received:
    13
    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Location:
    in the nappy dugout
    make it an even 5K and it is yours....i'll even throw in the fuzzy dice :D
     
  4. lowtideride

    lowtideride

    Messages:
    7,611
    Media:
    12
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    83
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2003
    Location:
    The Sunshine State
    my rig hovers around 120-130....
     
  5. Liam

    Liam

    Messages:
    4,548
    Media:
    31
    Albums:
    4
    Likes Received:
    13
    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Location:
    in the nappy dugout
    but is that good???
     
  6. lowtideride

    lowtideride

    Messages:
    7,611
    Media:
    12
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    83
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2003
    Location:
    The Sunshine State
    um i dont notice....haha....as long as they are with in 10-15 of each other dont worry about it.
     
  7. chitown40

    chitown40

    Messages:
    2,112
    Likes Received:
    23
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2004
    Location:
    Buffalo Grove, IL
    Per FSM, 149/cylinder is what it should have started with back in '87. So, like Al said, as long as there is less than a 10% difference between cylinders you should be ok.
     
  8. airon23

    airon23

    Messages:
    734
    Media:
    11
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    303
    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Location:
    Reno NV
    I'm a little dumb but what exactly does high compression/low compression mean?
     
  9. Doc

    Doc

    Messages:
    5,925
    Media:
    33
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    420
    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2004
    Location:
    Utah
    Higher compression means your piston rings are doing a better job of sealing the combustion chamber shut, giving higher compression on the up-stroke.
     
  10. NocalFJ60

    NocalFJ60

    Messages:
    3,550
    Media:
    6
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    6
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    It also depends on your altitude.The higher the altitude the lower the pressure.

    Your numbers sound fine. Also the guage could be off some. Like said above even if the guage is off it is just as important if they all are within 10%.
     
  11. Liam

    Liam

    Messages:
    4,548
    Media:
    31
    Albums:
    4
    Likes Received:
    13
    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Location:
    in the nappy dugout
    what about wet and dry testing...what does that actually mean. What would a typical service dept do?
     
  12. NocalFJ60

    NocalFJ60

    Messages:
    3,550
    Media:
    6
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    6
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    If it is low then you can add some oil to the cylinder and retest. If the pressure comes up then that means the oil helped seal up the rings to increase the pressure. The dry measurement is just after the engine is warm without adding oil. The typical service dept. would just do a dry probably unless one was low and then you can use the wet to tell if it the rings.
     
  13. Liam

    Liam

    Messages:
    4,548
    Media:
    31
    Albums:
    4
    Likes Received:
    13
    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Location:
    in the nappy dugout
    so i am guessing that a range of 131 to 135 is good compression...
     
  14. lowtideride

    lowtideride

    Messages:
    7,611
    Media:
    12
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    83
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2003
    Location:
    The Sunshine State
    yulp sure is.
     
  15. Liam

    Liam

    Messages:
    4,548
    Media:
    31
    Albums:
    4
    Likes Received:
    13
    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Location:
    in the nappy dugout
    good...now sumone buy it then.... :cool: :D
     
  16. cruiser4life

    cruiser4life

    Messages:
    3,576
    Likes Received:
    118
    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2003
    Location:
    CLT

    Good thread. Been wondering about some of this stuff for a while.

    What is a typical increase (percentage-wise) when the transition is made from dry to wet?

    In other words, how much will the wet test typically help raise the compression?

    How much of a delta between the wet and dry test indicates a problem with the rings?

    If they are within 10% on both dry and wet (no matter the increased compression with the wet) is everything OK?

    Thanks!!
     
  17. chitown40

    chitown40

    Messages:
    2,112
    Likes Received:
    23
    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2004
    Location:
    Buffalo Grove, IL
    If your compression is good dry, then you don't need to do a wet test. You can do a wet test to try to determine if the rings are bad or if the problem is in the head. Also a leakdown test using shop air can give you lots of info. I never did a leakdown test, as I was able to determine most of my engine problems with a dry and wet test. NO change in my one bad cylinder and it turned out to be a bad valve from a cracked intake manifold. This is common on the 2F's because the heat risers sometimes stick in the closed position thereby overheating the aluminum intakes and causing them to crack right under the carb.
     
  18. cruiser4life

    cruiser4life

    Messages:
    3,576
    Likes Received:
    118
    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2003
    Location:
    CLT
    Thanks for the added detail.

    I guess a better way to approach it would be to define good. You mention above that 149 per cylinder is the "new" value.

    You also mention that as long as all cyclinders are within 10%, then everything is OK.

    So, if let's say the dry test produced all 110's and 115's and the wet test produced all 125's and 130's, then it would be OK or good?

    Trying to understand what number is too low even if the variance is within 10%.

    Thanks.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.