I need to replace my split intake tube. Will the 95-97 intake tube fit a 1994 fzj80? Thanks
Quick ?? Will 95-97 intake tube fit 94 fzj80 (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter ampline
- Start date
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Not a part number guru, but this should help.
Toyota Parts Online | Genuine Toyota Parts & Accessories
Toyota Parts Online | Genuine Toyota Parts & Accessories
- Thread starter
- #3
I see the intake tube listed on part websites and eBay as fitting 1991-1997 and then fitting 95-97.. which is why I'm confused.
If it's all the same part, then I would say the eBay lister didn't do their due diligence.
SUMMIT CRUISERS
SILVER Star
See pic above on the shortened version on a 94.
Last edited:
- Thread starter
- #6
Thank you. The 91-92 thing was what was confusing me (3fe vs 1fz). So it sounds like I'll order the 95-97 and cut an inch off. I couldn't find the correct 93-94 replacement.
890man
SILVER Star
Test fit before you cut. I bought an eBay one listed for the 95+ to install on my 94 and it fit fine. Sure glad I didn't just cut it first.
- Thread starter
- #8
Absolutely.. thanks for the info
For the 1FZ-FE engine there are only two air intake options:
17881-66060 and 17881-66080.
The first part number is from 8/1992-1/1995.
The second part number is from 1/1995-1/1998.
Pics attached. There are slight difference in terms of their exterior construction. Both are manufactured by Toyoda Gosei. The angles of the turns are indeed different mainly because of the difference between the size of the earlier AFM and the later MAF.
IMO, they would be ok to use in a cross-reference style considering the earlier one is significantly more expensive than the later tube.
That said, the exterior construction does have me wondering why they were developed and constructed in the way they way they were: smooth vs the geometric iteration of the later one. My assumption is because of some sort of air flow necessities between the AFM/MAF and the throttle body.
Someone like @scottryana might have some more insight into the necessary turbulence of different air metering systems.
17881-66060 and 17881-66080.
The first part number is from 8/1992-1/1995.
The second part number is from 1/1995-1/1998.
Pics attached. There are slight difference in terms of their exterior construction. Both are manufactured by Toyoda Gosei. The angles of the turns are indeed different mainly because of the difference between the size of the earlier AFM and the later MAF.
IMO, they would be ok to use in a cross-reference style considering the earlier one is significantly more expensive than the later tube.
That said, the exterior construction does have me wondering why they were developed and constructed in the way they way they were: smooth vs the geometric iteration of the later one. My assumption is because of some sort of air flow necessities between the AFM/MAF and the throttle body.
Someone like @scottryana might have some more insight into the necessary turbulence of different air metering systems.
That sounds legit to me! Seriously, though, that is pretty logical. Credit given.
