I suspect that when it was earlier stated that there was 'no compression,' the compression actually wasn't tested. The mechanic just assumed that was the case because the belt had broken and it wasn't running with new belt, and he may not be familiar with the argument on non-interference vs. interference on the 2uz (can't blame him too much there, the books do say its interference).
Glad its running again though, and I'm not sure if I'd be too concerned about that variation in comp in 7 and 8. It was probably there before, s*** gets worn.
Glad its running again though, and I'm not sure if I'd be too concerned about that variation in comp in 7 and 8. It was probably there before, s*** gets worn.