Mark,
When you say pad do you mean on the outside of the frame, or on the engine bay side?
Would a 62 box be better than a 60 box??
thanks
Ryan
When you say pad do you mean on the outside of the frame, or on the engine bay side?
Would a 62 box be better than a 60 box??
thanks
Ryan
90% of the GM style saginaw conversions I have seen have badly hacked cross members. 80% have been cracked when I looked at them. All but two have had nasty looking reinforcement (if any) to address the reduced strength of the butchered cross member.
This swap *can* be done cleanly... but it usually is not.
And the box interferes with winch mount/winch selection options. And the steering shaft is more likely to interfere with engine/exhaust too.
The BRB mounting plate can locate your box pretty nicely. The Downey plate should have been aborted on the drawing board.
In a properly located scout or FJ60/80 steering box conversion, using a appropriate pitman arm on an SOA rig, the shock is bottomed out and the spring is arching backwards before the spring can contact the pitman arm. On an SUA rig I don't think that the spring can come up far enough to hit a non-dropped pitman arm.
There is no need to brace or beef the frame with the scout/F60/80 conversion on an FJ40. I weld a mounting pad to the side of the frame and nothing further is needed.
Mark...