New Toyota belt is too big (1 Viewer)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Joined
Mar 14, 2006
Threads
280
Messages
6,017
Location
Sandy Eggo
Website
www.markkuz.com
So I wanted to replace the belt that came with the 40 that was obviously not OEM and too old to be trusted. But the new fan pn 99343 11265-77 is just a tad too long and I get a squeal on start-up and even can notice some slippage. It is adjusted to max length to answer the obvious question. Is there another fan belt I can get that is a better fit?

Belt that came with the old girl
BD1681FD-4D91-4EA1-9D70-87F78C4D55B8.jpeg


Replacement belt from Toyota
CEA380D3-5BCE-416E-949A-B03BBAC3255F.jpeg


Fitment of new belt.
A1A81000-762F-4252-AB8E-A6D7D43CDD37.jpeg

DBEB36E8-5481-4862-97C1-117522642418.jpeg
 
I did a quick search on the part number and it came back as fitting an 81-84 Land Cruiser. You didn't list what year yours was or if any parts had been changed.
 
I did a quick search on the part number and it came back as fitting an 81-84 Land Cruiser. You didn't list what year yours was or if any parts had been changed.

Indeed. It would be helpful to know what the vehicle is.

I'm going to ass-u-me a 1975 FJ40 as that vehicle appears in his sig-line. If so, the part number on the sleeve is correct for the application. Does the number physically on the belt match that?
 
If it is a 75 FJ40 the alternator is incorrect. That may or may not have an impact. What is the diameter of the pulley?
This one is correct.
20221126_093425.jpg
20221126_093351.jpg


Note: If you look carefully you will see the number on the fan belt is 90916-02047. That number is replaced by 99343-11265-77.
 
Note that 90916-02047 / 99343-11265 (L=1275) is indicated as US spec.
While EUR, GEN and CND are listed with the reference 90916-02044 / 99343-11060 (L=1065).

If I remember correctly Alternator on US spec goes on the RH side of the engine with the 2F while it stays on the LH side on most of the world? Not sure if this is the reason for the different length...
 
So I wanted to replace the belt that came with the 40 that was obviously not OEM and too old to be trusted. But the new fan pn 99343 11265-77 is just a tad too long and I get a squeal on start-up and even can notice some slippage. It is adjusted to max length to answer the obvious question. Is there another fan belt I can get that is a better fit?

Belt that came with the old girl
View attachment 3178196

Replacement belt from Toyota
View attachment 3178197

Fitment of new belt.
View attachment 3178198
View attachment 3178199



Alternator Belt (P/N 9932301040) works on ours. Another option is to ping @ToyotaMatt for a new alternator tension bracket?
I did a quick search on the part number and it came back as fitting an 81-84 Land Cruiser. You didn't list what year yours was or if any parts had been changed.
Indeed. It would be helpful to know what the vehicle is.

I'm going to ass-u-me a 1975 FJ40 as that vehicle appears in his sig-line. If so, the part number on the sleeve is correct for the application. Does the number physically on the belt match that?
Note that 90916-02047 / 99343-11265 (L=1275) is indicated as US spec.
While EUR, GEN and CND are listed with the reference 90916-02044 / 99343-11060 (L=1065).

If I remember correctly Alternator on US spec goes on the RH side of the engine with the 2F while it stays on the LH side on most of the world? Not sure if this is the reason for the different length...



now , now ......

this is a EAZY PEEZY issue to resolve 🤔


NOTE : The Nomenclature Foot Notes in my 1987 USA Spec. Dealership issued Fast-Mover ..

- i bet @cruiserdan still has his Copy :cool:



- i almost forgot to ask ?

Does the
YELLOW / WHITE Mitsubishi / BANDO / OEM TOYOTA part # 99343-11265-77 match exactly what IS stamped on the DRIVE BELT itself in colored ink ?





8B6C117B-3264-404F-8863-07A59265E0CC.jpeg



CABCB154-CF22-476D-BDAF-B1D7DA058461.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Not quite.
20221126_113002.jpg
 
Indeed. It would be helpful to know what the vehicle is.

I'm going to ass-u-me a 1975 FJ40 as that vehicle appears in his sig-line. If so, the part number on the sleeve is correct for the application. Does the number physically on the belt match that?
- i almost forgot to ask ?

Does the
YELLOW / WHITE Mitsubishi / BANDO / OEM TOYOTA part # 99343-11265-77 match exactly what IS stamped on the DRIVE BELT itself in colored ink ?

That makes two of us.
 
I did a quick search on the part number and it came back as fitting an 81-84 Land Cruiser. You didn't list what year yours was or if any parts had been changed.
Sorry I haven’t checked in and did not mention that it is for a 75 FJ40
 
Indeed. It would be helpful to know what the vehicle is.

I'm going to ass-u-me a 1975 FJ40 as that vehicle appears in his sig-line. If so, the part number on the sleeve is correct for the application. Does the number physically on the belt match that?
I will double check the belt when I get home
 
What is the production date? 1975 is the model year but the production date will determine what belt is needed.
Feb, 1975 Toyota Land Cruiser FJ40
VIN #FJ40192909
Engine 2F 154673 Frame FJ40~192909
Color: Light Green Poly - PPG 45036
Card: #621
Trim Level: LE11
 
Indeed. It would be helpful to know what the vehicle is.

I'm going to ass-u-me a 1975 FJ40 as that vehicle appears in his sig-line. If so, the part number on the sleeve is correct for the application. Does the number physically on the belt match that?

Confirmed that the belt does match the packaging.

DD9D28CA-FB23-4818-8F5E-B56B1ACD3E68.jpeg

35114F43-1540-403A-9187-0733792E6BC6.jpeg
 
If it is a 75 FJ40 the alternator is incorrect. That may or may not have an impact. What is the diameter of the pulley?

Note: If you look carefully you will see the number on the fan belt is 90916-02047. That number is replaced by 99343-11265-77.
The alternator pulley diameter seems to be about 3.25”
 
I believe the pulley on our 1975 pictured is about the same. How does your alternator adjusting bracket compare to the one I posted?
 
I'm referring to the shape and mounting points.
 
I'll repost this angle. It's difficult to tell from the angle of your photo but it appears that your bracket may not be as long as this one.
20221126_093351.jpg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom