This tired argument again?Figure 8 tests suspension's quick transition......so it is very much a Moose test and then some! It is NOT a slalom test.
In fact, due to LX 21" / 22" rims, LX actually can pull SLIGHTLY better around a circle (aka "G's") than LC on 18" rims in all the tests that I have seen.
So, despite advantages of LX in pulling more G's, LC beats it in Figure 8. Why?
Remember, AHC is reactive. KDSS is pro-active. AHC has many sensors but it still cannot see the road ahead. It has to wait for things to happen before it can respond.
Adjustable is one thing...but adjusting has compromises as I discussed above.
For one thing, in terms of dynamic changes during high speed maneuvering KDSS is easily matched by the cross linking in AHC. The only advantage KDSS brings is the ability to “disconnect” the swaybars during low speed maneuvers. Also.. maybe it should be pointed out that just because a computer isn’t involved doesn’t make KDSS “proactive”. It still only reacts to the physics working on the system. I guess the 300s E-KDSS must be a huge step backwards since it will be fully reactive now..
Until my LX is doing Mach speeds, I think a computer is fast enough to make changes. Not to mention the changes being made are between what is essentially a normal 200 to a better handling 200.
The best thing about all this is how this conversation started with you demonstrating how little you understand AHC and then making arguments about how it works. I guess that’s our own fault for getting trolled