gaijin
GOLD Star
Nope. That's not the same interpretation at all. There are base inflation pressures that one should not go below. For LT tires, that's ~35psi, even if load or weight requirements put it underneath that.
Not sure why you are talking about LT-Metric tires when I was talking about P-Metric tires, but if you stick with P-Metric tires as I did, you will see it is exactly the same interpretation. If you contend that an LT-Metric tire which should be inflated to 42psi is somehow better when run underinflated at 37psi (I'm guessing here, but is that why you contend pressures even as low as 35psi are OK?), then it is, by extension, your contention that a P-Metric tire that should be run at 33psi will somehow also be better when run at 28psi - despite the manufacturer's recommendation to run at 33psi.
You and I won't agree here and we've been debating this for awhile. My point is load rating is only one aspect for tire pressure tuning. It's a safe interpretation but not the only variable. You're an engineer. Interpreting engineering considerations from a singular vector would be myopic.
If it's safe for the heavier LX, there is absolutely zero reason it's not safe for the LC. If it's not safety, then it's to the individuals prerogative if they'd like to suffer a unduly harsher ride for... gaijin's technical correctness?
You are correct. As long as you insist on recommending underinflated pressures for LC200's, You and I will never agree.
"Technical correctness" does not belong to me, I merely point it out... at least for those who are willing to see it.
Sorry for the thread hijack - now, how about those Michelins, eh?