No, bearing clearances are not the only criterion. And to say it's a "huge part" seems silly....which part of your lubrication system is not a "huge part"? Heat removal is a huge part. Material selection is a huge part. Flow distance is a huge part. Surface finish is a huge part. Coking tendency is a huge part. I believe there are plenty of huge parts that affect the eventual oil specification.
I respect your OP. All I was addressing is that someone else seemingly suggested that because their 4.7L engine specified any of the following: 5W-30, 10W-30, 15W-40, or 20W-50, it must be okay to consider for the 5.7L engine? And when I confronted that ill-advised comparison, you wanted to downplay it?
If you want to use a grade of oil contrary to OEM, go for it. And I appreciate that you provided your justification. And I think there MIGHT be POTENTIAL benefits in CERTAIN applications (yes, loaded with wiggle words). But, if you want to purport it as a better selection with "increased protection", I think you go too far.
You asked for our thoughts.
I respect your OP. All I was addressing is that someone else seemingly suggested that because their 4.7L engine specified any of the following: 5W-30, 10W-30, 15W-40, or 20W-50, it must be okay to consider for the 5.7L engine? And when I confronted that ill-advised comparison, you wanted to downplay it?
If you want to use a grade of oil contrary to OEM, go for it. And I appreciate that you provided your justification. And I think there MIGHT be POTENTIAL benefits in CERTAIN applications (yes, loaded with wiggle words). But, if you want to purport it as a better selection with "increased protection", I think you go too far.
You asked for our thoughts.