Sas 100 is a waste of time IMHO. It’s wide and the frame’se front end will not accept a solid axle as the 105’s. Just stick the v8 in the 80 and call it a day then.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Sas 100 is a waste of time IMHO. It’s wide and the frame’se front end will not accept a solid axle as the 105’s. Just stick the v8 in the 80 and call it a day then.
Sas 100 is a waste of time IMHO. It’s wide and the frame’se front end will not accept a solid axle as the 105’s. Just stick the v8 in the 80 and call it a day then.
Plus the chassis is different, they need lots of lift to fit a solid axle under the front.
Sas 100 is a waste of time IMHO. It’s wide and the frame’se front end will not accept a solid axle as the 105’s. Just stick the v8 in the 80 and call it a day then.
Plus the chassis is different, they need lots of lift to fit a solid axle under the front.
Yeah, the more I thought about it, I really don't think I could move-on to a Rubicon.
Thanks, will look into this anyway, as a SAS 2005 100series would be awesome! Was also thinking to be patient until I possibly come across one that's for sale... or do those sell fast?
Thats why I had the mindset of trying to have just one vehicle. Even with the stock gearing and 35's I cruise comfortably @75 in So Cal, and @55-60 up steep grades like the grapevine. To put things into perspective, last night I test towed a friends 1800lb pop-up trailer up a #3-mile grade that was @7% incline. Had to switch down to "2" from "D" and maintained a speed of @55mph while the engine was @3700rpm. I dont plan on getting a big camper or toy hauler (just for a couple of quads and a dirt bike), so if I re-gear to 4.88, and keep the trailer under 3500lbs, I should be okay right?
View attachment 1979950