compare flex of suspension options

J

Jackson

Joined
Feb 20, 2003
Messages
83
Location
Upstate NY
Website
www.trailaddict.com
For as much as I want a rig that's ready to wheel hard this summer, my budget isn't going to let that happen.  So I've decided to put a little more money into buying a clean, solid rig, and passing on the SOA (or at least putting it on hold).  This got me thinking... soa is clearly the best suspension setup for flex and ground clearance, right?  The only major down side to soa is the higher center of gravity... but you'll get that with any lift, right? Can you still get good performance from a suspension lift?  Or is the money better saved and put in the soa fund?

Anyone ever run a suspension lift (say approx 4") then moved to a soa setup?  Any comments?
 
woody

woody

Staff member
Admin
Joined
Jan 15, 2002
Messages
10,361
Location
Toquerville UT
Website
www.TieRodMedia.com
4" softrides for 3 years, then SOA for the past 3....night and day difference, would never go back to lift springs again.

Course, now I'm designing a rear 1/4 elliptical/4-link setup, so really, the process never stops...

SpaceGhost went from 4" skyjackers all around to 4" skyjacker fronts/SOA rear to Waggies front and SOA rear to SOA front and rear to coilovers/links all in the past 2 years....

trust me....it never ends....
 
J

Jackson

Joined
Feb 20, 2003
Messages
83
Location
Upstate NY
Website
www.trailaddict.com
Thanks for the info... that's pretty much what I figured. I've got a 4Runner now with a 3" suspension lift. The extra ground clearance is nice, but it takes sooo much more force to compress the stiffer springs - especially in the front with the IFS. That's why the soa is such a good option, you are basically keeping the stock suspension, so ride, compression, and droop shouldn't change much.

Believe me, I know all about the disease. I've been modding my 96 4Runner for about 2 years now, and I haven't even dented the list of things I want to do. Projects/mods get added to the list faster than I can finish them. The problem is that it's not worth putting that kind of money into an IFS 4runner. That's one of the reasons I'm looking for an FJ40.
 
woody

woody

Staff member
Admin
Joined
Jan 15, 2002
Messages
10,361
Location
Toquerville UT
Website
www.TieRodMedia.com
actually, because of how the axle places force on the springs, you will get more suspension travel with a SOA versus SUA on the identical springs. Ride is similar, but obviously has more sway than stock.
 
R

rusty40

Joined
Mar 6, 2002
Messages
91
Website
www.imagestation.com
yeah cruisers rock over the 4runner

personally I like the early cruisers cuz the were made heavier at least the bodies were

and you can swap whatever drivetrain you want into one
new into old

cruisers rock
 
Design311

Design311

Joined
Apr 25, 2002
Messages
203
Location
Bella Vista, AR
Website
sf4wheel.alloffroad.com
From what I've read Skyjackers, BDS and Old Man Emu stuff ride and flex the best. OME is expensive but I hear that it's top notch. For less money you can get the next best thing, the BDS or Skyjacker lifts. I personally have the 4" Skyjackers and I love them. They ride better than any other brand of springs that I've owned (Superlift, Genuine Suspension, Downey, Rough Country). Just my 2 pennies worth...
 
M

Mavric1298

Joined
Oct 28, 2002
Messages
163
i agree, but i also run Pinnicle springs, and with rancho rs9000's they ride very well. with 3" lift and 33's i can get the wheels to flex all the way into the wheel well's
 
F

FJ60

Joined
Jun 27, 2002
Messages
270
A proper SOA was priced to me for $3500 so I went with a 4"TPI smokey mountain kit ($700), funny thing was my shocks and leafs had OME tags on them ???
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom