So from what I’m reading here, if my new Toyota master and slave are in top shape and verified to travel greater than .500” at the bearing, I could get away with the stock GM 11” clutch setup.
Just when everyone thinks they have it figured out, here comes another curveball!
It doesn’t and that was the main reasoning behind the internal slave. I always like using parts I can source locally, but it seems somethings gotta give no matter what route I take.
Well, I have the cast fork, pivot ball and bell housing that came with the SM420. The only hydraulics I have are the original Toyota, which I believe are 3/4" but I would have to check. I guess I am weighing out my options of whether I should:
(a) buy a low throw clutch and use stock hydraulics...
Perhaps I left a critical part out: I am still in the research phase of this conversion and I’m trying to do it once instead of assemble/disassemble/repeat. I have all my parts ready to go together minus the clutch setup and I’m trying to figure out what throw out would allow me to use a stock...
Hello all,
So I have a '74 FJ40 I am installing a 350/SM420 into and have run into the clutch engagement/disengagement problems that have plagued many trying to use the stock Toyota hydraulics. My question is this: are any of you running a hydraulic throwout bearing on your setup? In the little...