Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Definitely where this will end up. I am seeing an exo-cage on a bobbed 80 frame in less than a few years time and it will be pretty f*cking coolJust bob it and be done
Just bob it and be done
Definitely where this will end up. I am seeing an exo-cage on a bobbed 80 frame in less than a few years time and it will be pretty f*cking cool
The biggest improvement to my truck's handling after I did the 3-link was redoing the rear suspension and adding a splined swaybar out back. Seriously guys. Run the numbers. Pay attention to your oversteer. Fixing the rear geometry easily added an extra 10-15mph to my highway cruising speeds and the only reason I don't go faster than 75 is because of the wobbles from the unbalance beadlocks. Cornering speeds were also greatly improved. I can only imagine how much better it would be with a front swaybar. @nukegoat can also attest to how much better the truck drives with corrected rear geometry.
If 2.5” and 35s already feels sketchy and everything is set up correct than this Will no doubt be worse. Not trying to lead anyone on the incorrect path, when your driving my truck over 70mph you have to actually be driving and paying attention. It does move around more, and fast corners you have to be a tad more cautious with. Pay more attention to the road signs is all I’m saying. If it says 55mph around a corner you better not go 75 around it or you’ll probably die haha
I think adding a DeltaVS panhard lift bracket could have killed some of the oversteer and unlikeable characteristics of the rear geometry when lifted without completely redesigning it. If you spent all that money and time redoing the rear and can't go faster you'd better balance those or change tires/wheels!
Edit: If it had a 4th link would that help keep things less sketch? I would think there would be room for that without any wizardry. Asking for a friend.
@NateMob just added a panhard lift bracket on his 3linked truck and he said it helped a lot. I’ll make one for myself soon.
I doubt a 4link would be much different. These things are just heavy and really flexi suspension just has a couple downsides. But having swag bars front and rear would certainly help the onroad manners. I imagine that would fix just about everything based on what @nukegoat has stated.
I think adding a DeltaVS panhard lift bracket could have killed some of the oversteer and unlikeable characteristics of the rear geometry when lifted without completely redesigning it. If you spent all that money and time redoing the rear and can't go faster you'd better balance those or change tires/wheels!
@NateMob just added a panhard lift bracket on his 3linked truck and he said it helped a lot. I’ll make one for myself soon.
Its not the 3 link vs 4 link vs 5 link thats relevant as much as it is a re engineering of the geometry. it is tremendously different when designed with the kinematics in mind. Suspension design for quantifiable things is not subjective - avoid anecdotes here. Have epistemological humility for this stuff.@NateMob just added a panhard lift bracket on his 3linked truck and he said it helped a lot. I’ll make one for myself soon.
I doubt a 4link would be much different. These things are just heavy and really flexi suspension just has a couple downsides. But having swag bars front and rear would certainly help the onroad manners. I imagine that would fix just about everything based on what @nukegoat has stated.
Its not the 3 link vs 4 link vs 5 link thats relevant as much as it is a re engineering of the geometry. it is tremendously different when designed with the kinematics in mind. Suspension design for quantifiable things is not subjective - avoid anecdotes here. Have epistemological humility for this stuff.
This thread is engineering cancer
Its not the 3 link vs 4 link vs 5 link thats relevant as much as it is a re engineering of the geometry. it is tremendously different when designed with the kinematics in mind. Suspension design for quantifiable things is not subjective - avoid anecdotes here. Have epistemological humility for this stuff.
I raised my panhard (DIY) prior to redoing the rear suspension and also lowered the frame mount. In my experience it made no difference in the truck's handling and I'd even go as far as to say these glowing reviews are a bit placebo. There's a lot more to the rear suspension geometry aside from just the panhard. My truck is not that tall and I was still sitting at 15º of oversteer before I redid the rear links which is really bad.
Stock rear suspension on my truck w/ raised panhard:
He's been in the hundred series section a lot lately and it shows.
I wanna look into what making the lower links longer would do for all this. Kinda curios. And not mess with the top links/panard
I AM A MEMBER OF THE BOURGEOISIE NOWHe's been in the hundred series section a lot lately and it shows.
Engineering cancer sure, but like with everything most can and do live without perfection. Does the rear geometry suck yes. Will most fix that, definitely not. Could my front geometry be better. For sure. Will I change any of that? Aside from lifting the rear panard and adding longer lower links, probably not. Not worth the fab in my mind. These truck will always suck at speed. It’s to be a ok crawler and a slow highway pig.
Moving the gas tank changes a LOT about these rigs. Kudos - that looks well doneI triangulated the rear. Ended up narrowing the frame as well from the C pillar back to accommodate the new gas tank. The difference in flex is significant and it justifies 16" + travel coilovers, but to be totally str8 forward I have not had a chance to take it to the trail and real world it through its paces works well in the Dunes, but need to add Sway bars/anti rock so it doesn't break loose at speed.
View attachment 1798717
View attachment 1798718
View attachment 1798719