Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
I thought this was a completely different conversation and was getting excited for my next "trip" to the plains of Alabama!
If you have the LSD in the rear, ATRAC would be defeated in the rear bc it would never sense "losing traction". However, in the front, ATRAC would still be functional. I think it's a great combo.This has been discussed in the 100 forum.
The consenus were 1. Whats the point because ATRAC would be defeated bc the locker would take over. and 2. Just try it ya 100 pansies and report back
If you have the LSD in the rear, ATRAC would be defeated in the rear bc it would never sense "losing traction". However, in the front, ATRAC would still be functional. I think it's a great combo.
I swapped a rear axle from a stock locked '99 LC into my wife's '01 LX and now have a rear OEM locker and ATRAC that works for the front wheels. Same thing here.
Good point I forgot the LSD is not selectableIts not the same bc your wife can select when the rear is locked, with and LSD its automatic and in certain situations ie ice and snow you might not want the rear locked. I think you really lose a valuabe on road benefit if you put an LSD in the rear of an ATRAC equipped cruiser.
A LSD and A Trac would compliment each in other low traction situations.
As for the Auburn, I am not a fan. They work well, but there's a host of design issues that lead to a part that, when used, tend to not be long lived. They can only be rebuilt once, and that is performed by the manufacturer.
If you truly want a LSD, the factory unit, with possible modifications, is my vote.