So calculations I had previously for those two housings (various sources, but unconfirmed).
17010 is 8cm nozzle. Some approximations on tip clearance gave me 0.57 inch A/R
17020 is 6cm nozzle. Some approximations on tip clearance gave me 0.49 inch A/R
These are essentially confirmed accurate now with Mudgudgeons numbers and photos.
But the A/R is only part of it. When you throw in turbine size to the mix the 17020 turbine is 25% smaller flow wise (17010 is 33% bigger). Which is why it's a far more active turbo that produces more boost sooner.
I'll qualify my measurements by saying I'm a rank amateur. May not have it quite spot on, but should be close.
@Dougal, is tip clearance the difference between OD on the turbine wheel vs ID of the turbine housing?
The 1HD-FTE turbine measured right on 58.5mm, all the specs I can find put it at 59.8mm. I'm pretty sure the ID on the housing was 60mm, which leaves fRk all clearance if a turbine was actually 59.8mm
One thing I wondered about in calculating AR is the distance the nozzle opening is away from the turbine. It was quite different between the two. The 1hdfte was a flatter tangent, but the nozzle opening was further from turbine tip.
the 1hdt nozzle has a much steeper tangent angle, and the nozzle opening was closer to the tips of the turbine
Is that distance significant in calculating AR? Or am I over thinking it? I'm sure the tangent angle plays a part