![]() |
Support our Advertising Vendors!! |
|
|
#1 |
|
IH8MUD Addict
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 558
|
Am I SCREWED? - Stairs & building code
I'm in the process of completing a largish (1400 ft^2) 2 story addition on my home. Don't even ask when the first permit was pulled - life intervened for awhile.
Anyway, I recently removed the window and wall from the existing house to make the entrance for the addition. There is a landing there that goes down one step into the 1st floor of the addition, and the steps to the 2nd floor go up from this landing also. I'll post a picture later. Anyway, this landing and the stairs were done several years ago, and somehow I screwed up the height of the landing wrt the inside floor AND the first step ![]() Calling the landing height 0: Height of interior hardwood flooring: 1 1/4" Height to top of first stair: 8 1/8" Height of other stair risers: 7 5/8" So - to match the riser height on the first step to all the other risers, I only have room for 0.5" of flooring. PITA, but not impossible. But that will leave me 3/4" below the level of the interior floor ![]() The building code is based on the 2003 International Building code (with ~140 pages of adjustments & exceptions). As I understand it, the max allowable deviation in riser height is 3/8" - so I could possibly get away with 7/8" of flooring and be left with only 3/8" height difference between the landing floor, and the floor of the existing house. So - any suggestions? Any other loopholes I might be able to take advantage of? Raising the stairs is not really an option - they are seriously tied into everything. Hardwood stairs also - so adding height on top of the treads isn't feasible either. Will the difference in floor height be an issue - it will likely be somewhere between 1/2" and 3/4" and I can make that transition over approximately a 6" width. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
IH8MUD Lifer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: In The Storm Cellar!
Posts: 1,682
|
some pics would definetly help great minds figure this one out....i have a few ideas but need to look....
osagecruiser __________________ 1968 fj40 under restoration and nearly complete! thanks to everyone here!!! 1972 fj55 1963 fj45 swb.... Tornado Alley Cruisers tlca member #14777 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
IH8MUD Addict
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 558
|
Yep, I'll get on that. Posting from work at the moment and don't have my pics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
IH8MUD Addict
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 558
|
Here's a quick sketch...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
IH8MUD Lifer
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,202
|
could you bump up your landing to the first step?
__________________ Real Americans drink PBR |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
IH8MUD Addict
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Back in Vegas
Posts: 570
|
Unless you house is part of a multifamily complex, you are under the 03' IRC (with local amendments)not the IBC. The IBC has no regulations for single family dwellings.
What is the dimension on the top riser with flooring at the top landing? What type of floor finish do you plan for the bottom, top landing & treads? Your best bet is to limit the flooring thickness at the bottom landing to a max of 7/8". Make sure that no other risers are over 7-5/8" as this will dictate where the 3/8" rule applies. There is no way around the 3/8" rule. The only way to do it right would be to rebuild the stairs. Here is an excerpt form the 03 IRC, enjoy :R311.5 Stairways. R311.5.1Width. Stairways shall not be less than 36 inches (914 mm) in clear width at all points above the permitted handrail height and below the required headroom height. Handrails shall not project more than 4.5 inches (114 mm) on either side of the stairway and the minimum clear width of the stairway at and below the handrail height, including treads and landings, shall not be less than 31.5 inches (787 mm) where a handrail is installed on one side and 27 inches (698 mm) where handrails are provided on both sides. Exception: The width of spiral stairways shall be in accordance with Section R311.5.8. R311.5.2 Headroom. The minimum headroom in all parts of the stairway shall not be less than 6 feet 8 inches (2036 mm) measured vertically from the sloped plane adjoining the tread nosing or from the floor surface of the landing or platform. R311.5.3 Stair treads and risers. R311.5.3.1 Riser height. The maximum riser height shall be 73/4 inches (196 mm). The riser shall be measured vertically between leading edges of the adjacent treads. The greatest riser height within any flight of stairs shall not exceed the smallest by more than 3/8 inch (9.5 mm). R311.5.3.2 Tread depth. The minimum tread depth shall be 10 inches (254 mm). The tread depth shall be measured horizontally between the vertical planes of the foremost projection of adjacent treads and at a right angle to the tread’s leading edge. The greatest tread depth within any flight of stairs shall not exceed the smallest by more than 3/8 inch (9.5 mm). Winder treads shall have a minimum tread depth of 10 inches (254 mm) measured as above at a point 12 inches (305) mm from the side where the treads are narrower.Winder treads shall have a minimum tread depth of 6 inches (152 mm) at any point. Within any flight of stairs, the greatest winder tread depth at the 12 inch (305 mm) walk line shall not exceed the smallest by more than 3/8 inch (9.5 mm). R311.5.3.3 Profile. The radius of curvature at the leading edge of the tread shall be no greater than 9/16 inch(14.3 mm). A nosing not less than 3/4 inch (19 mm) but not more than 11/4 inch (32 mm) shall be provided on stairways with solid risers. The greatest nosing projection shall not exceed the smallest nosing projection by more than 3/8 inch (9.5 mm) between two stories, including the nosing at the level of floors and landings. Beveling of nosing shall not exceed 1/2 inch (12.7 mm). Risers shall be vertical or sloped from the underside of the leading edge of the tread above at an angle not more than 30 (0.51 rad) degrees from the vertical. Open risers are permitted, provided that the opening between treads does not permit the passage of a 4-inch diameter (102 mm) sphere. Exceptions: 1. Anosing is not required where the tread depth is a minimum of 11 inches (279 mm). 2. The opening between adjacent treads is not limited on stairs with a total rise of 30 inches (762 mm) or less. R311.5.4 Landings for stairways. There shall be a floor or landing at the top and bottom of each stairway. Exception:Afloor or landing is not required at the top of an interior flight of stairs, provided a door does not swing over the stairs. A flight of stairs shall not have a vertical rise greater than 12 feet (3658 mm) between floor levels or landings. The width of each landing shall not be less than the stairway served. Every landing shall have a minimum dimension of 36 inches (914 mm) measured in the direction of travel. R311.5.5 Stairway walking surface. The walking surface of treads and landings of stairways shall be sloped no steeper than one unit vertical in 48 inches horizontal (2-percent slope). R311.5.6 Handrails. Handrails shall be provided on at least one side of each continuous run of treads or flight with four or more risers. R311.5.6.1 Height. Handrail height, measured vertically from the sloped plane adjoining the tread nosing, or finish surface of ramp slope, shall be not less than 34 inches (864 mm) and not more than 38 inches (965 mm). R311.5.6.2 Continuity. Handrails for stairways shall be continuous for the full length of the flight, from a point directly above the top riser of the flight to a point directly above lowest riser of the flight. Handrail ends shall be returned or shall terminate in newel posts or safety terminals. Handrails adjacent to awall shall have a space of not less than 11/2 inch (38 mm) between the wall and the handrails. Exceptions: 1. Handrails shall be permitted to be interrupted by a newel post at the turn. 2. The use of a volute, turnout, starting easing or starting newel shall be allowed over the lowest tread. R311.5.6.3 Handrail grip size. All required handrails shall be of one of the following types or provide equivalent graspability. 1. Type I. Handrails with a circular cross section shall have an outside diameter of at least 11/4 inches (32 mm) and not greater than 2 inches (51 mm). If the handrail is not circular it shall have a perimeter dimension of at least 4 inches (102 mm) and not greater than 61/4 inches (160 mm) with a maximum cross section of dimension of 21/4 inches(57 mm). 2. Type II. Handrails with a perimeter greater than 61/4 inches (160mm)shall provide a graspable finger recess area on both sides of the profile. The finger recess shall begin within a distance of 3/4 inch (19mm) measured vertically from the tallest portion of the profile and achieve a depth of at least 5/16 inch (8 mm) within 7/8 inch (22 mm) below the widest portion of the profile. This required depth shall continue for at least 3/8 inch (10 mm) to a level that is not less than 13/4 inches (45 mm) below the tallest portion of the profile. The minimum width of the handrail above the recess shall be 11/4 inches (32mm)to a maximum of 23/4 inches (70 mm). Edges shall have a minimum radius of 0.01 inches (0.25 mm). R311.5.7 Illumination. All stairs shall be provided with illumination in accordance with Section R303.6. R311.5.8 Special stairways. Circular stairways, spiral stairways, winders and bulkhead enclosure stairways shall comply with all requirements of Section R311.5 except as specified below. R311.5.8.1 Spiral stairways. Spiral stairways are permitted, provided the minimum width shall be 26 inches (660 mm) with each tread having a 71/2-inches (190 mm) minimum tread depth at 12 inches from the narrower edge. All treads shall be identical, and the rise shall be no more than 91/2 inches (241 mm). A minimum headroom of 6 feet 6 inches (1982 mm) shall be provided. R311.5.8.2 Bulkhead enclosure stairways. Stairways serving bulkhead enclosures, not part of the required building egress, providing access from the outside grade level to the basement shall be exempt from the requirements of Sections R311.4.3 and R311.5 where the maximum height from the basement finished floor level to grade adjacent to the stairway does not exceed 8 feet (2438 mm), and the grade level opening to the stairway is covered by a bulkhead enclosure with hinged doors or other approved means. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
IH8MUD Addict
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Back in Vegas
Posts: 570
|
Creating a landing that steps down 8-1/4" into the opening should work also (good idea) as this step would not be part of the flight of stairs. you need to to take the floorplan into account to make sure that this step create no other code violations.
Before you do anything, you should ask your inspector first. If they don't like your'e compliance methods they can make your job miserable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
IH8MUD Addict
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Back in Vegas
Posts: 570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
IH8MUD Addict
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 558
|
Interesting idea, but I don't think it will work. In the sketch below the blue area is the entryway from the old house into the addition. So as you come through that doorway, you would have to step up onto the landing, and then 2 steps later, down into the addition.
Also, that entryway is just a standard door height - there wouldn't be enough clearance - at least not for me @ 6'3" |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |||||
|
IH8MUD Addict
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 558
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
IH8MUD Addict
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 558
|
Quote:
It will make more sense when I get a picture up. And yes, I plan to consult with the inspector before doing anything here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
IH8MUD Addict
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Back in Vegas
Posts: 570
|
A raised landing will work, except the min. head clearance is in the IRC 6'-8".
I think a hardwood bottom landing with a tapered transition strip (maybe 3-6" wide, but located somewhere to provide continuity) from the landing area to the adjacent finish floor would work out & not look too out of place. Just make sure the tapered strip is not located in the code required landing area. Be sure & check the IRC ammendments for your area to make sure they haven't ammended something beyond what is required by the IRC ( I have seen some pretty strange ammendements!). Edit: the above info was posted prior to reading you last post
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
IH8MUD Addict
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 558
|
Here's a picture finally. The area outlined in blue is where I propose to make the 3/8" -> 3/4" transition ramp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
IH8MUD Addict
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Back in Vegas
Posts: 570
|
The transition strip should look fine. I would try to make it the width of the opening but that will alot more work than thin steeply tapered strip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
IH8MUD Addict
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 558
|
I don't think it will be that hard to make a full width transition. I have a 12" planer, so I'll just make a jig that holds one edge of the board 3/8" higher then the other. Then run it through the planer, stepping down the thicknes until you get a full width pass.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
IH8MUD Lifer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NW side of chicago
Posts: 1,051
|
i dont know how big the landing is and how it is attached to the floor but maybe you could take out the top plywood subfloor and put something thinner. This allows a level area and you could split the difference between the riser and the threshold opening in the entrance to the room. You could put 2x(4,6,8,etc) widthwise underneath the new thinner subfloor to prevent flexing. Maybe forget the thin subfloor and build the finished floor directly on solid wood if the inspector/codes allows it. Just throw ideas around.
__________________ 88 fj62 w 209k 94 80series 167k |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
IH8MUD Lifer
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,202
|
so, what did you do?
__________________ Real Americans drink PBR |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
IH8MUD Addict
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 558
|
I'm going to make the final decision this weekend when I set the height for the landing step.
But I think I will make the first step as short as possible, taking full advantage of the allowed 3/8" variance. Then I'll make up the difference (between 1/4" and 3/8") between the inside floor and the landing floor by making a sloped piece for the transition through the doorway. Not perfect, but not to bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
some 6, no 4, and more 6
|
Three thoughts come to mind on several projects when I am dealing with building officials.
First one, whip out my PE seal and they don't question it (this ain't gonna help you here) Second, get with the building official and see what he (or she) can come up with. You might be able to get a written exception. The main issue with consulting them on it is the fact that - if you ask the question, it begs an answer. Third, it is easier to ask for forgiveness than for permission. Not necessarily the best approach and could cost you some money in the end. I would try and slim the landing hardwood down as much as possible and you might be okay. Could you plane the boards down a bit and use thinner pieces there? More than likely, you could get it close and it would pass inspection with flying colors ![]() bk __________________ 76fj40 77fj55 85fj60 00uzj100 90Hilux Crew Cab Diesel 07 5.7L Tundra DC "I spend most of my money on beer, land cruisers, and women...the rest I just waste" - Curran |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
IH8MUD Addict
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Eastern PA.
Posts: 699
|
Quote:
Kevin __________________ 72, 74 and 78 FJ40s |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
IH8MUD Lifer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NW side of chicago
Posts: 1,051
|
I was thinking about the cleats and inset plywood panels but thought it would be kinda uneven in surface if the plywood would be lower or higher by a 1/16 here or there to the top of the joists.But now that I think about it, that can be fixed by using a belt sander to get all the tops relative flush. I just hope that if you went with this plan that the current plywood top was screwed down and construction adhesive wasn't used because the construction adhesive would be a real pain to remove off the joists.
__________________ 88 fj62 w 209k 94 80series 167k |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
IH8MUD Addict
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Eastern PA.
Posts: 699
|
Quote:
Kevin __________________ 72, 74 and 78 FJ40s |
|
|
|
|