Don't be Cherry-Stemmed Out of Access (1 Viewer)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Threads
235
Messages
248
Location
N. CA
Website
www.delalbright.com
Don’t Be Cherry-Stemmed Out of Access

Be In-touch; Informed; and Involved

By Del Albright



cherry-stem v. to extend a spur of unprotected non-wilderness land, especially a dead-end road or trail, through a protected wilderness area. Also as a noun and as the form cherrystem. (source:Double-Tongued Dictionary)


“Cherry Stem” roads are generally classified as “allowed” use and NOT “prescribed” use. Meaning, therefore, that “cherry stem” roads can easily be closed when they do not fit nearby “Wilderness values,” such as what happened in the Gasquet-Orleans road in the Six Rivers National Forest (read congressional testimony about this from BlueRibbon Coalition here:


https://www.sharetrails.org/news/20...s-congressional-hearing-boxer-wilderness-bill


(More on BRC working to ensure “cherry stem” is understood in Congress: https://www.sharetrails.org/alerts/...rest-service-agrees-brc-california-wilderness)


Do not be fooled that leaving your access as a “cherry stem” through Wilderness will ensure future use….something as simple as a landslide washout of your “cherry stem” will defacto close that route when the land owning agency tells you that you can’t take heavy equipment in to repair your trail or work off trail to clean up a wash out. I have personally experienced this in Death Valley National Park years ago.


cherry_stem.jpg



If you’re going to buy into cherry stem routes, then be sure the language in law and rule is such that you are assured some long term use, repair, maintenance and access. I can fairly well predict you will have a hard time achieving this….but you can try. The stronger your language in statute, the better your chances of having that “stem” still be there in the future.


BlueRibbon Coalition worked long and hard with politicians on HR233 which gave some protection to cherry stem roads. Here is the language:


HR233 where it states the following:


m) CHERRY-STEMMED ROADS.—

(1) DEFINITION.—In this subsection, the term ‘‘cherrystemmed

road’’ means a road that is excluded from the wilderness

areas designated by section 3 by a non-wilderness corridor

having designated wilderness on both sides, as generally

depicted on the maps described in such section.


(2) CLOSURES AND RESTRICTIONS.—The Secretary shall

not—

(A) close any cherry-stemmed road that is open to

the public as of the date of the enactment of this Act;

(B) prohibit motorized access on a cherry-stemmed road

that is open to the public for motorized access as of the

date of the enactment of this Act; or

(C) prohibit mechanized access on a cherry-stemmed

road that is open to the public for mechanized access as

of the date of the enactment of this Act.


(3) EXCEPTIONS.—Nothing in this subsection shall be construed

as precluding the Secretary from closing or restricting

access to a cherry-stemmed road for purposes of significant

resource protection or public safety.


Again, the key is for recreationists to stay in touch, involved and fully informed as to the outcome of political decisions and land use designations that affect access to your recreation.


BRC, your champions of responsible recreation: http://www.sharetrails.org


Del
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom