for now, all I can say is my 22RE with 38 inch swampers is getting better miles than my 80 series LC with 33 inch good years. Go figure
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
SizzleChest said:i think the 3.0 V6 was only rated to get 16-17 when brand new. are you maybe using imperial gallons?
550km/65L = 19.9 mi/galarlingallagher said:89 22re 8 litres to 10k, 550 on tank of 65l
Trail junk '88 reg cab, 180,000 miles, on 32"s, with 2 year old O2 sensor = 22 mpg consistently.Jukelemon said:So, let me know MPG and whether or not your 02 is newer or stock.
KliersLC said:Right
My last 88 4runner with tready all terrain 265 70 16's got 15-17 when LOADED perhaps overloaded.Hi. Let me know what you guys are getting.
I see 19mpg highway/city combined all of the time. Seems a bit low to me.
I keep getting the 02 sensor code but then it goes away-it is original on a 160k truck. I know it is time to swap BUT wanted to see if that was going to make a marked improvement.
So, let me know MPG and whether or not your 02 is newer or stock.
Thx
Just picked up a high miles perfect compression 87 4runner 4x4 that barely ran. The culprits were many but the Pesky TPS was number 1. its adjustment must have a huge bearing on MPG. Hobbling along crippled it got 15, near all town, a couple of hwy test runs as I was ironing things out.Hi. Let me know what you guys are getting.
I see 19mpg highway/city combined all of the time. Seems a bit low to me.
I keep getting the 02 sensor code but then it goes away-it is original on a 160k truck. I know it is time to swap BUT wanted to see if that was going to make a marked improvement.
So, let me know MPG and whether or not your 02 is newer or stock.
Thx