 |
|
08-09-09, 02:09 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 118
|
SteelArts BJ42 Landcruiser Build, Links and Coil Overs - 4 Door !!
Hi Guys, I don't usually post buildups but I have spent so many hours reading others peoples and learning from them I thought it would be a good idea.
This story started many many yeras ago when I did my first ground up re-build on a BJ 42 Landcruiser. Body off bare metal, 3B with a turbo kit, 3" lift, twin lockers, cage etc etc. Ended up selling it many years later and regretted it ever since.
Spent a few years looking around for it, last I heard it was in Townsville on the Army Base.
1st 40 Series.
Anyway fast fwd about 10 years and the opportunity came about to buy another. I alway said I wanted to have a cool car to give my kid and with the birth of our 1st not to far away and me wanting to buy it before he was born, the hunt was on.
So I wnet searching and found another BJ 42 which was worth a look. It wasn't an LX but it was an 84 model and had power steering, 5 Speed and most of the LX stuff. It also had a nice little engine fitted in place of the 3B diesel, a 13BT.
The 13BT was a direct injection Turbo charged version of the 3B. Gave it much more punch and made it very nice to drive (well as nice as a stock 40 would drive)
So a deal was done and I became the proud owner of a BJ 42. I drove it around for a while and got busy so put it into storage ..
BJ42 Mk2 with 13BT.
Before I put it into storage I played around with a few spring packs, fitted 60 series leafs in the back and a new bull bar, cut the rear guards and fitted 35" tyres. Never really finished any of it though.
So fast forward to a month ago, work has settled down, kid is almost 2 and I decide it is time to get the 40 back on the road so out she came and up onto the hoist for a plan to be hatched....
Following on from some interesting ideas and information collection, some of you may have seen my posts on here, outers, Ih8mud, pirate etc I came up with the following specs. Time frame is to have it done by the end of the year.
The Plan
Fit Fox Coil Overs front and rear, 14" front, 12" rear
Radius Arms up front triangulated 4 link up back
35" MTZ on DC1 MT 15 x 10 mags with beadlocks
6 point family cage with rear seat and baby seat mounts
Gearmaster reduction gears
4.88 R&P (TBC)
ARB Air Lockers front and read
Custom Fuel tank - Stainless
Custom Water Tank - Stainless
Custom 3" Exhaust system - Stainless
Recaro's in front with a custom Stainless centre console
Custom rear seat
ARB front bar
Warn XD 9000 winch
Custom rear bar with receiver hitch
Handmade rear flares
Widened front guards to cover tyres.
Custom 3" stainless snorkel
few other minor mods.
One very important thing is that everything is to be 100 legal and blue plated, no interest in an illegal car.
So there it is, 4 months to go..... now as I am not silly enough to think I can do it all on my own in this time while still working I will be getting some help from a few people I have found who seem to be up to the task.
I won't lie I can be a PITA of a customer as I know exactly want I want, but I am also quite happy to pay for it so as long as they deliver what they promise in the time specified to the standard required I will be a very happy customer.
I will post details of things as they get done.... some of this has already happened. so will post some pics when I find them.
This is what I am out to achieve stance wise..
Last edited by SteelArt; 10-12-09 at 07:11 AM.
|
|
|
08-09-09, 06:02 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Snowy Mountains, NSW, Australia
Posts: 53
|
Nice project mate, I'll be following it with interest. Can I ask what you paid for the new BJ? Where abouts in Australia are you?
I too have bought an FJ45 ute that I intend to restore and pass on to my now 6 month old son in about 17.5 years time.
Good luck.
|
|
|
08-09-09, 06:21 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by henlan
Nice project mate, I'll be following it with interest. Can I ask what you paid for the new BJ? Where abouts in Australia are you?
I too have bought an FJ45 ute that I intend to restore and pass on to my now 6 month old son in about 17.5 years time.
Good luck.
|
Sweet the 45's are a nice rig, not my style as I liek the shorties and need more leg room than the 45's offer.
I am in Brisbane, I bought the "new" BJ 42 for around $4k back in like Jan 2007. It has next to NO rust and I liked the 13BT which was a low km import.
Looking at the prices now it was still good buying. Sold a heap of stuff it came with and at the end it owed me around $2k which will be the cheapest part of the build me thinks...
|
|
|
08-10-09, 05:24 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 118
|
it begins
Ok so I have mocked up the 40 series with the 15 x 10's and the 35" MTZ. It has 60 series rear springs and some timber wedged under the front. What I am tryingg to do is get the look and feel I am after before I settle on a ride height and stance. The rear will be going up another inch or so to get it about level and then back another 8" (making 104" total)
At this moment the plan has evolved and I wl going to extend the wheelbase to around 102 - 104" and extended the tub to keeo the rear wheels about where the sit now.
The ARB Bull bar is on and I will decide if it stays or not once the ride height and wheel base has been set.
I also picked up some of these ..
They are 2.5's with 12" for the rear and 14" for the front.
This is what I will be doing to the tub to get the wheelbase to look correct.
Last edited by SteelArt; 08-17-09 at 04:26 AM.
|
|
|
08-17-09, 04:23 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 118
|
mmm
Well it is official, my cruiser is now topless and about to go under the knife. A cutting location has been selected and a few other decisions have been made..(more to follow on those later)
So who can guess where the cut is gunna be ??
Last edited by SteelArt; 08-17-09 at 04:29 AM.
|
|
|
08-17-09, 04:46 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Posts: 185
|
Nice shorty mate, and with a 13BT already bolted between the rails...well you suck!  It's sure to be a bit more traffic-friendly than my old faithful 'B' diesel.
I don't know if those stripes down the side are factory but i kind of dig em (apart from that swirly thing) and reckon it gives it a vintage look. Looking forward to watching your progress.
__________________
Cheers,
Dan
79 BJ40 3rd owner!
97 HDJ80R 1HD-FT Multivalve Turbo-Diesel P-O-W-E-R !!
|
|
|
08-17-09, 05:39 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Falco80
Nice shorty mate, and with a 13BT already bolted between the rails...well you suck!  It's sure to be a bit more traffic-friendly than my old faithful 'B' diesel.
I don't know if those stripes down the side are factory but i kind of dig em (apart from that swirly thing) and reckon it gives it a vintage look. Looking forward to watching your progress.
|
Cheers, won't be to many stripes left shortly ....
Yeah the 13BT makes it much nicer to drive, although I reckon my old 3B with Turbo had more down low than the 13BT.
|
|
|
09-15-09, 08:03 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 118
|
Well I won't bee needing these anymore
After spending way to many hours reading Iron Pgs thread on his 40 series I decided coils and a longer wheel base was a good idea.
bye bye -- to these
after I drove on to this --
Then had a chop chop to this --
Now just need to fit these
and do some metal glueing to get it back in one piece....
silly forums giving me all these ideas  .
|
|
|
09-15-09, 09:40 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
250+ Club
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: West Georgia
Posts: 692
|
congratulations man, best thing you could do.....leafsprings are a tool of the devil
__________________
This is your life, and it's ending one minute at a time...
'71FJ55 '74FJ40 '86FJ60- custom rigs with ninja fabrication
|
|
|
09-15-09, 12:00 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Site Addict
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,752
|
Sweet! You keeping the rear frame? Subscribed  .
__________________
"The devil made me do it the first time. The second time I done it on my own."
|
|
|
09-15-09, 04:50 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sputnik40
Sweet! You keeping the rear frame? Subscribed  .
|
Keeping, yes, moving backwards yes, it has been relocated 300mm.
I started a build thread over in the 40 series section but figured it would be more interest in here.
If any of the mods out there can help out by moving it here then that would be great and I will just add to it ..
more cut cut
Then figured it should go back on to hold the body where it was going ..
But wasn't real keen on it ever coming off again so had some plates added.
104" wheel base here I come
|
|
|
09-15-09, 06:51 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
what he said
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 13,121
|
That rear axle at full stuff?
|
|
|
09-15-09, 09:05 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mace
That rear axle at full stuff?
|
yeah give or take a little.
With the 35" tyres on it that is all she has. The tyre hits the top of and the inner side of the guard.
|
|
|
09-15-09, 09:59 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 118
|
Ok, cheers to whoever put the threads together.
Update time, going back a little while it looked like I was never going to have the time to get the cruiser sorted by Christmas due to massive amounts of real work getting in the way of my hobby. So as a result I made the decision to outsource some of the more time consuming aspects such as fabricating, setting up and getting Department of Transport approvals on the suspension and chassis extension.
Luckily for me I found a top bloke named dale who runs a small business called 2DExtreme Fabrications on the south side of Brisbane ( Home). Anyway after talking to him for more than a few hours a deal was done and he set about fabricating the 4 link rear and radius arm front with custom links, arms etc. Fox coil over were supplied and the rest was up to him.
Once he has finished and got it all approved I will get it back, get the cage sorted and weld the body back together, do the brakes, exhaust, re-wire, paint, rebuild the diffs etc etc and hopefully have it all on the road by early next year.
Anyway just wanted to give credit where credit is due.
|
|
|
09-15-09, 10:05 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mace
That rear axle at full stuff?
|
ok that picture maybe a little deceptive as it wasn't actually "full stuff" it was full lift on the jack.
This might make it a little clearer.
|
|
|
09-15-09, 10:18 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
what he said
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 13,121
|
why make the axle end upper so tall?
|
|
|
09-16-09, 12:09 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mace
why make the axle end upper so tall?
|
I was under the impression that the further apart the better for control, is this not the case ?
|
|
|
09-16-09, 01:30 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: a frozen hell, winter sucks
Posts: 198
|
From what I understand from the design I used, a inch or two higher can make a big difference. A difference in squat vs antisquat. Having the uppers mouted higher will increase the antisquat, lower increase squat. My design with my axle mount 8.5" of separation gives it like 80% squat. My are adjustable if I move it up to about 9.5" of separation from the lowers links at the axle I get 90-maybe 95% squat. I dont rember exactly those are just ball park numbers. How high yours look you will be in the anti squat. I am not sure your separation from lower links. ALso how close to level the axle upper mounts are to the frame upper mounts, could have a effect on squat vs anti. flater more level link will be closer to neutral. If your uppers on the axle are higher than on the frame and the link slanting down,axle high to frame low, antisquat. Slanted from the frame high to the axle low, squat. Your links will load up from tourqe and take weight off of the springs when antisquat is the factor. Maybe even causing the truck to lift in the rear when the throttle is down. I am pretty neutral, but still on the squat side of the spectrum and it will load the springs more than the links and cause the truck to squat. Squat as in the springs compressing from the tourqe of the engine. It may cause the truck to sink under power. 0-99% = squat 100% neutral
101 %and up is anti squat. you want to be neutral or just below or just above depending on preference so adjustment is nice.
THis is what I understand but hopefully someone could correct me if there is any misinfo there
__________________
74 fj40, 2f tbi injection, orion t-case, Detroit's, Warn x8000i, soa-sr front, 4-link w/fox coilovers rear
|
|
|
09-16-09, 01:48 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 118
|
ok so in most cases you would want a little squat to give you better traction yeah ?
When you talk about seperation are you talking about from parallel ? So if your fronts are 8" apart and your back are 10" then you have 2" of seperation ?
I will get some measurements and put them in the 4 link calc
|
|
|
09-16-09, 08:22 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
what he said
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 13,121
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by notaf-ingjeep
From what I understand from the design I used, a inch or two higher can make a big difference. A difference in squat vs antisquat. Having the uppers mouted higher will increase the antisquat, lower increase squat. My design with my axle mount 8.5" of separation gives it like 80% squat. My are adjustable if I move it up to about 9.5" of separation from the lowers links at the axle I get 90-maybe 95% squat. I dont rember exactly those are just ball park numbers. How high yours look you will be in the anti squat. I am not sure your separation from lower links. ALso how close to level the axle upper mounts are to the frame upper mounts, could have a effect on squat vs anti. flater more level link will be closer to neutral. If your uppers on the axle are higher than on the frame and the link slanting down,axle high to frame low, antisquat. Slanted from the frame high to the axle low, squat. Your links will load up from tourqe and take weight off of the springs when antisquat is the factor. Maybe even causing the truck to lift in the rear when the throttle is down. I am pretty neutral, but still on the squat side of the spectrum and it will load the springs more than the links and cause the truck to squat. Squat as in the springs compressing from the tourqe of the engine. It may cause the truck to sink under power. 0-99% = squat 100% neutral
101 %and up is anti squat. you want to be neutral or just below or just above depending on preference so adjustment is nice.
THis is what I understand but hopefully someone could correct me if there is any misinfo there
|
Sort of, the vertical seperation between the uppers and lowers on the axle is just a single thing that helps define antisquat (and a slew of other suspension geometry aspects). As is not the end all be all of suspension design. I am not a huge fan of large amounts of vertical seperation at the axle end. It tends to cause more complications than anything else. The link orientation and frame side mounts have a significant amount to do with the design as well. YOu happen to run the numbers on that design in the 4 link calculator?
You have to remember that all of the numbers that you calculate are guesses.. Untill you actually start wheeling your truck, you will not have a good impression of how the truck behaves with the suspension you designed. Having an adjustable suspension is a very good thing.
People have been successfull with AS numbers from 60% to 250%. It all depends on the rig. I prefer a bit more neutral AS numbers myself, but that is also based on an estimated center of gravity.
|
|
|
09-16-09, 04:53 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 118
|
Ok Mace cheers for that.
Top arms are 590 long [ the measurement from the center to the diff up top is 500] and the bottom arms are 820 long and 920 to the center of the diff. The distance at the front height is 220 and the diff is 300.
I am going to plug them in now
|
|
|
09-16-09, 07:15 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
Site Addict
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB/Vancouver Island, B.C.
Posts: 1,156
|
wicked build! cant say that i have seen very many BJ42 builds at all....i always kind of lean more towards building a FJ, i love the diesel in my BJ42 but...is there much or anything for gearing options for a BJ? that would be my only concern with running big boots behind a 3B or in ur case a 13BT. in any case its a wicked build and thats a really clean looking truck, wish mine looked like that!
__________________
'74 FJ40- disc brakes, saginaw,8274, SM420/3spd case, 60 rears in the back, more for the front and a whole lotta tube waiten to be bent
'78 FJ45 project rig (not even under the knife yet)
x2 '81 BJ42 (DD)
the list goes on...
|
|
|
09-16-09, 08:20 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by yotawheeler
wicked build! cant say that i have seen very many BJ42 builds at all....i always kind of lean more towards building a FJ, i love the diesel in my BJ42 but...is there much or anything for gearing options for a BJ? that would be my only concern with running big boots behind a 3B or in ur case a 13BT. in any case its a wicked build and thats a really clean looking truck, wish mine looked like that!
|
Cheers,
Gearing ??? They are pretty much the same as the FJ with a different donk and input shafts. I can get every custom gear option for an FJ for a BJ, there is no difference in them in that area.
I will prob goto 4.88's once up and going if the 35"s are to much for it. I will at least put a set of T-case crawlers in it although the 13BT does well down low it is always nice to have a low low.
|
|
|
09-18-09, 05:11 AM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
|
KOOL AAROW
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pimpin part in SanAntonio TX
Posts: 2,357
|
nice ride better build keep it comin I'm lovin it
__________________
82 FJ60 5.3, 4l60E, OME Heavy, 33 KM2's 410's, ARB bull & side bars ...SOA in the works
85 FJ60 Trail beater SM 420 crawler box lockers 456, 4D's bobed & choped with a Metal Tech cage
GIT-R-DONE!!!!
TLCA #15374
low riders want SWITCHES... 4 wheelers want SHIFTERS
www.jkcustoms.com
|
|
|
09-18-09, 07:04 AM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kling-on
nice ride better build keep it comin I'm lovin it 
|
Cheers,
Well rear shocks are in and front diff is now out and brackets are fitted.
Dale should have it back on wheels next week with some luck and then I can get it back and make me some body panels
Then I just have to decide if I am gunna wack a back set of doors in it while she is all cut up
|
|
|
09-18-09, 11:47 AM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
|
Site Addict
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,752
|
Will the shocks clear the frame with the coils installed? Looks tight. What are the thoughts on having coilovers inboarded on the axle housing like that - I've been holding off on my 4-link as everyone here has convinced me to just the rear frame off and go buggy, so as to get the best shock placement. Ok - I'm also tired of basically smashing the tub on everything - and there's lots of benefits to going buggy, but would like to see some discussion on the inboarded shock mounts....
__________________
"The devil made me do it the first time. The second time I done it on my own."
|
|
|
09-18-09, 01:09 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
|
Site Addict
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB/Vancouver Island, B.C.
Posts: 1,156
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelArt
Cheers,
Gearing ??? They are pretty much the same as the FJ with a different donk and input shafts. I can get every custom gear option for an FJ for a BJ, there is no difference in them in that area.
I will prob goto 4.88's once up and going if the 35"s are to much for it. I will at least put a set of T-case crawlers in it although the 13BT does well down low it is always nice to have a low low.
|
yup, gearing...i understand that the axles, trans and x-case will have similar gearing in stock form as the FJ's but what i meant was aftermarket options like the SM420, SM465 or the NV 4500 transmissions that can be used on the F engine family. is there anyplace who makes a crawl box, aftermarket x-case or do you know any tranny's that can be put behind the 3B/13BT...thats kinda what i was getting at. my FJ40 didnt really crawl all that well with stock gears and 35's...it did alright but the SM420 has made it much better
__________________
'74 FJ40- disc brakes, saginaw,8274, SM420/3spd case, 60 rears in the back, more for the front and a whole lotta tube waiten to be bent
'78 FJ45 project rig (not even under the knife yet)
x2 '81 BJ42 (DD)
the list goes on...
|
|
|
09-18-09, 09:25 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by yotawheeler
yup, gearing...i understand that the axles, trans and x-case will have similar gearing in stock form as the FJ's but what i meant was aftermarket options like the SM420, SM465 or the NV 4500 transmissions that can be used on the F engine family. is there anyplace who makes a crawl box, aftermarket x-case or do you know any tranny's that can be put behind the 3B/13BT...thats kinda what i was getting at. my FJ40 didnt really crawl all that well with stock gears and 35's...it did alright but the SM420 has made it much better
|
Ah ok .. well being in Australia we don't have those box's all over the place like in teh USA. A H41 4 speed will give you a lower 1st crawl ratio but I am just going to put a set of reduction gears in teh T-case and then prob 4.88's R&P to get the ratio with the 35's back to stockish.
|
|
|
09-18-09, 09:33 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sputnik40
Will the shocks clear the frame with the coils installed? Looks tight. What are the thoughts on having coilovers inboarded on the axle housing like that - I've been holding off on my 4-link as everyone here has convinced me to just the rear frame off and go buggy, so as to get the best shock placement. Ok - I'm also tired of basically smashing the tub on everything - and there's lots of benefits to going buggy, but would like to see some discussion on the inboarded shock mounts....
|
Ok clearance is an interesting term when fitting coil overs and links to your 40 series and you have cut the rear end off
Wouldn't you agree ?
I have no issues with the placement of the coil overs being in board, they travel fine and will dampen without issue. I would never cut the back off and buggy is as it would never get rego then.
I would be keen to hear why people have issues with doing it this way.
Will they clear with coils on .... well they are a little close
Luckily it isn't like it hasn't been chopped up anyway so a little more shaping ain't gunna kill it 
|
|
|
09-19-09, 09:03 AM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
|
what he said
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 13,121
|
body roll is one of the issues..
|
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|