A note of sympathy for all the Democrat cruiserheads

[BHMCruiser]

Originally Posted by swank60

Where's the rim-shot when you need it?

good question. I also don't know how to do the emoticons. I'm the worst.

[VTFJ40]

Originally Posted by Jman

Is the Red Cross governmentally administered? Is it chartered by Congress? Is the President of the U.S. it's honorary chairman? Sooo, you're saying, the people who stole all the money were. . . . the Kennedys?

Spit it out, man. Just what are you saying?

Obviously, my sarcasm is wasted on you.

Republican minded folk are more likely to be in scandals involving money.

[tclndcrz]

Originally Posted by HZJ60 Guy

...
You see that's where you loose your argument before it starts. EVERY woman already has that ability BEFORE she gets pregnant! It's about responsibility, and the democrats dont agree that people should be heald accountable for that responsibility.
....

and you lose your argument when a woman gets raped and needs an abortion

[HZJ60 Guy]

Originally Posted by tclndcrz

and you lose your argument when a woman gets raped and needs an abortion

No I dont. That aspect of the situation was never discussed. Ive always been for protecting children, the health of the mother and incest and rape. You cant argue personel responsibility like I do in those situations.

[Jman]

Originally Posted by VTFJ40

Obviously, my sarcasm is wasted on you.

Republican minded folk are more likely to be in scandals involving money.

LOL, I think I just couldn't perceive the subtlety, since everything in this thread has to be strictly black or white.

[LongIsland60]

Originally Posted by VTFJ40

Obviously, my sarcasm is wasted on you.

Republican minded folk are more likely to be in scandals involving money.

I hope that is more sarcasm.

[Front Range 4x4]

Originally Posted by HZJ60 Guy

Read that last part of the post you went out of your way to quote for God's sake. You missed it!

For God's sake?

I didn't miss it but do note that you still won't answer the simple question.

Jesus didn't make exceptions for "just and worthy" causes or "nations best interests" as acceptable reasons for killing. If you're a Christian you should consider why you can find it so easy to ignore Christ's teachings in favor of the teaching of O'Rielly, Limbaugh and Bush.

[HZJ60 Guy]

Originally Posted by cxs

For God's sake?

I didn't miss it but do note that you still won't answer the simple question.

Jesus didn't make exceptions for "just and worthy" causes or "nations best interests" as acceptable reasons for killing. If you're a Christian you should consider why you can find it so easy to ignore Christ's teachings in favor of the teaching of O'Rielly, Limbaugh and Bush.

Yes I did answer your question. And here it is:(from your quote)

"Etc etc etc. The answer is yes if you deem the cause just and worthy. If you deem the cause in your (that being your nations) best interest. If you deem the cause just in the protection and security of your nation states best interest."

Ok, how did that not answer your question?????

[HZJ60 Guy]

Originally Posted by cxs

For God's sake?

I didn't miss it but do note that you still won't answer the simple question.

Jesus didn't make exceptions for "just and worthy" causes or "nations best interests" as acceptable reasons for killing. If you're a Christian you should consider why you can find it so easy to ignore Christ's teachings in favor of the teaching of O'Rielly, Limbaugh and Bush.

Look you're just wrong. As a christian you have a responsibility to protect yourself and your family. What we're talking about here is symantics. I say that stopping Hilter was doing just that. I say stopping Japan was doing just that. I say that doing whatever we need to do to stop another attack on this nation my murdering terrorists is doing just that.

Fine you disagree with me. We can leave it at that.

[Jman]

Sooooooo, we can use human judgment to decide when to ignore commandments? I think I've just lost my moral center.

[tclndcrz]

Originally Posted by HZJ60 Guy
...
You see that's where you loose your argument before it starts. EVERY WOMAN already has that ability BEFORE she gets pregnant! It's about responsibility,



no hzj you said EVERY WOMAN. you implied every single woman has the ability. if a woman gets raped then she is no longer every woman. if you didnt say every then i could agree with you more...

im sorry but it bothers me when republicans take things way out of context or use words to trick people.

[Front Range 4x4]

Originally Posted by HZJ60 Guy

Fine you disagree with me. We can leave it at that.

I logged on looking for a front valance for a 60 and ended up here





Let's leave it where it is but if you have a good valence I'll be your best friend





I'm gone....

[billmc]

Originally Posted by HZJ60 Guy

Oh and Swank, why is it so hard for you to realize that there really is right and wrong?

Everyone realizes there's right and wrong. The argument is over who really has the credentials to authoritatively distinguish which is which. You seem to suggest that the current Republican leadership does, but that just hasn't been born out by recent history.

[LongIsland60]

Originally Posted by Jman

Sooooooo, we can use human judgment to decide when to ignore commandments? I think I've just lost my moral center.

I am loosing my morale.

[Jan-78FJ40]

Originally Posted by HZJ60 Guy

Ive always been for protecting children, the health of the mother and incest and rape.

Dubya, is that YOU? The above is a clear Bushism...

[Cruisin'Carolina]

I'm right of center.

I got about half-way down page one, and threw up an little in my mouth.

I can't actually believe you guys are attacking each other over politicians.

The only choices we ever have is not the best person, but the least worst person, in our own individual opinions of what that is.

That alone is no longer worth my blood pressure or worry.

If we could have a constructive debate over issues, I'm in. People that have become masters of the photo op and talking points game?

Come on...

I don't hate Clinton. I do not know why people take Bush so personally.

I agree with those that said we ought to have a little more respect.

[yooper]

Originally Posted by Shahram

Save your sympathy for a demographic that doesn't regularly pull in 40%-50% of the vote. Libertarian Cruiserheads...now there's a group that needs your sympathy. We don't get any love. After you zealots and ideologues get through raping America, all we have to stand by is the principles that this country was founded upon. Y'know, the ones you piss on.

This is the post of the day, probably the week, and the political post of the year so far. Shahram, you are my idol.

Jman and Swank, you guys rock. Thanks for the entertainment.

Holy crap SOME of you in this thread are complete fucktard idiots.

I have no substantive contribution as it would be a total waste of my time.

Back to reading TUT....

Don't forget to check on The Ultimate Post !

[IDave]

My power went out today and the goddam republicans who run this state took 7 1/2 hours to fix it, so I missed all of this, and its taken me an hour to catch up. Sheesh.

[Skillet]

Originally Posted by BHMCruiser

Hutus - Tutsies
Crips - Bloods
Hatfields - McCoys
Eskimoes - Leprechauns

The cycle continues...

My point exactly.

You can come up with examples of questionable actions on all sides.

It will always be that way.

We really must look at the big picture.

[Skillet]

Originally Posted by Jman

Great Taste - Less Filling.

[thorvald]

so did Wenzel ever give him his money back?














































oops wrong thread


oh wait, this isn't pirate, my bad

[Spook50]

Originally Posted by msahr

She puts down the police, goes to visit the troops in Iraq and of course cuts in line in front of the troops for dinner (Bush waited in line out of respect for the soldiers, HC has no idea what that means). The idea of her being President sickens and disgusts me. God help us if she's elected.

This is the same worthless cunt that viewed military personnel in uniform as "a menace" in the White House and forbade them to be in uniform in the WH.

She's damn lucky I wasn't in Iraq when she was. I wouldn't be afraid to get gunned down for ridding the world of her sorry ass.

[koop]

Originally Posted by Spook50

This is the same worthless cunt that viewed military personnel in uniform as "a menace" in the White House and forbade them to be in uniform in the WH.

She's damn lucky I wasn't in Iraq when she was. I wouldn't be afraid to get gunned down for ridding the world of her sorry ass.

Ladies and Gentlemen, America's finest!

[BHMCruiser]

Originally Posted by Spook50

This is the same worthless cunt that viewed military personnel in uniform as "a menace" in the White House and forbade them to be in uniform in the WH.

She's damn lucky I wasn't in Iraq when she was. I wouldn't be afraid to get gunned down for ridding the world of her sorry ass.

I thought you were in the Air Force. Would you have hit her with a fighter jet?

[koop]

Originally Posted by BHMCruiser

I thought you were in the Air Force. Would you have hit her with a fighter jet?

No way. No honor in that kind of impersonal killing. He'd kill her in hand to hand combat because he ain't skered of no 60 year old woman. He's a trained killer.

LET ME SEE YOUR WAR FACE