We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want

[Bogo]

Originally Posted by msahr

you have a liberal media that sees itself as the mouthpiece of worry

The media is not liberal. It is now corporatist. It has been taken over by corporations and only displays what they want you to see. Never anything they think may hurt the bottom line. The independence of the media laws were all trashed long ago.

[msahr]

Originally Posted by IronYuppy

Ah, so that's what the last seven years has been about; "getting along with dems".

Damned liberals pulling the strings again.

You lost what remaining credibility* you had when you dragged out that old chestnut "liberal media", the catch-phrase for barrel-stroking, black-helicopter watching subterranean RWNJs everywhere.

*don't worry, you didn't lose much.

Ah yes once again the liberal mantra... "When you can't defend your position, use a personal attack".

Go back to sleep. Obviously you haven't been paying attention.

[wob]

Originally Posted by Zimm

everyone pay close attention.


this here is the mindset that leads to the demise of democracies.

think of the guys that didnt have any real political experience, that were president.... ill give you hint. name our best.


now think of the type of person that does....

you want tammany hall type political leaders? you want lobbyists? exactly how much "expreience" do you want?

do you think successful coups are led by political novices or professionals?

who do think owes more special interests a favor? someone thats been in politics for 10 years or 50?

[msahr]

Originally Posted by Bogo

The media is not liberal. It is now corporatist. It has been taken over by corporations and only displays what they want you to see. Never anything they think may hurt the bottom line. The independence of the media laws were all trashed long ago.

[Bogo]

Originally Posted by nat

however, when you start claiming that being liberal means you hate america or whatever other BS is being said, then you have become a "sheeple"

X2 with emphasis.

[Jman]

And, in other news, homeless middle class now using cars for shelter:

Mom forced to live in car with dogs - CNN.com

[msahr]

Originally Posted by Zimm

everyone pay close attention.


this here is the mindset that leads to the demise of democracies.

think of the guys that didnt have any real political experience, that were president.... ill give you hint. name our best.


now think of the type of person that does....

you want tammany hall type political leaders? you want lobbyists? exactly how much "expreience" do you want?

do you think successful coups are led by political novices or professionals?

who do think owes more special interests a favor? someone thats been in politics for 10 years or 50?

Ronald Reagan wasn't a Senator or Representative. He was a Governor.

By experience, listen to the dumbass statements B Hussein O makes.

"... then the world will like us again..." (paraphrasing here)

Who gives a shit that Canada or Iran doesn't like us? Sucking up to Akmafuckyoujad or whatever his name is isn't going to make him like us. It will validate to him and anyone that listens to him that he's right. It's stupid and dangerous.

(By the way, if the whole world doesn't like us, why do they try to be like us?)

['74 UA FJ]

Originally Posted by Jman

And, in other news, homeless middle class now using cars for shelter:

Mom forced to live in car with dogs - CNN.com

Move out of Santa Barbara, retards.

[JJS]

Originally Posted by '74 UA FJ

Move out of Santa Barbara, retards.

lol.

"I'm being forced to live in my car in the Malibu Hills! Woe is me..."

[Jman]

Originally Posted by '74 UA FJ

Move out of Santa Barbara, retards.

Yeah, no shit. And maybe save some money along the way.

Being rent poor when you're young is excusable; when you're old, it isn't.

[78-FJ40]

Originally Posted by Jman

Being rent poor when you're young is excusable; when you're old, it isn't.

Ding, ding, ding.

[wob]

Originally Posted by Jman

And, in other news, homeless middle class now using cars for shelter:

Mom forced to live in car with dogs - CNN.com

sweet baby jesus

Has she thought about moving?




EDIT: Hmmm - I see this has been discussed already.

[JJS]

I live in the ghetto. I only do it because I needed cheaper rent. I have to sleep with a .45 under my pillow, but I'm living within my means.

[Hilux]

Originally Posted by msahr

(By the way, if the whole world doesn't like us, why do they try to be like us?)

Now that an idiot can answer!

They don't "try" to be like us you 1/4 whit! They are forced!
Either get in line, or be left behind!

If you don't bow to us we'll make sure all that all anyone will want from you is your slave labor b/c everything else, and everyone else will move on and leave you in the stone age.

Think about it. The system perpetuates its self by its people and infrastructure. Take away the infrastructure and whats next to
go will be the people....then the country its self.


How can you compete in a global economy if you don't have the capitol?

How can you buy other country's assets that are used in your
goods and services if you are dirt poor?

Who will want to business w/ a dirt poor UNSTRUCTURED country?

"we'll make sure all that all anyone will want from you is your slave labor"



Now if you'll excuse me, I'm off to search the intertwine for a stereotype for a person like you.

[msahr]

Originally Posted by Hilux

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm off to search the intertwine for a stereotype for a person like you.

Thanks Captain Cut and Paste. No doubt you will. They're called...









Wait for it...










Liberal Mantra dirty word warning, word approaching, possible DEFCON 5...









CONSERVATIVES!

[Hilux]

Originally Posted by msahr

CONSERVATIVES!

If thats what a person is called that generally doesn't live beyond his means and is a realist, one that does not live in a fantasy world, then yes, thank you.






Don't label be bitch, I out grew this childish shit in pre school. And what is so bad about being...LIVING conservative?


Yes, you fuck, I'll take 30 mpg over 10. Does that make me an UNamerican bad guy?

That by definition makes america liberal. America cant live a single day w/o pissing away all the money they worked so hard for. Does that make you happy? NES is reporting 800 people a day are on its cutoff list. I.e 800 people that bought a POS Chevy V8 that they couldn't afford in the 1st place, and now cannot give away and have to feed it to get to their "means to an end", just to be able to feed their familys at night before they go to bed.

Does this make you happy? Is this "American?"

[Darwood]

Originally Posted by koop

Reagan signed California's Mulford Act in 1967. That made carrying a firearm in public verboten. He signed two pieces of legislation in the 80's; one which restricted certain types of handgun ammo (the infamous "cop killer bullets" bill) & another which prohibited the manufacture of firearms that could not be discovered by a metal detector (the "plastic gun" ban). Through an executive order he prohibited the import of shotguns that held over ten rounds. He supported the Brady Bill as well as the "assault weapons" ban.

I'd also like to point out that the Mulford Act had racist motives.

[burlew]

I love my box....

[Hilux]

Originally Posted by burlew

I love my hairy box....

uh, fixed? :barf:

[nat]

Originally Posted by burlew

I love my box....

I would love your bo............

wait, what?

[burlew]

Originally Posted by Hilux

uh, fixed? :barf:

did you forget your meds today?

[Darwood]

Originally Posted by sonnydaze

you need to check mccain and see why nra only gave him a c rating , obama is more progun that mccain google mccain 2000 second amendment

You're still in denial? Here's what both have to say about gun control... taken from their fucking web sites.

Obama:

Originally Posted by http://www.barackobama.com/issues/urbanpolicy/#crime-and-law-enforcement

Address Gun Violence in Cities: As president, Barack Obama would repeal the Tiahrt Amendment, which restricts the ability of local law enforcement to access important gun trace information, and give police officers across the nation the tools they need to solve gun crimes and fight the illegal arms trade. Obama also favors commonsense measures that respect the Second Amendment rights of gun owners, while keeping guns away from children and from criminals who shouldn't have them. He supports closing the gun show loophole and making guns in this country childproof. He also supports making the expired federal Assault Weapons Ban permanent, as such weapons belong on foreign battlefields and not on our streets.

McCain:

Originally Posted by http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/Issues/77636553-6337-4ecd-b170-49e1c07d2fbd.htm

Assault Weapons--
John McCain opposes restrictions on so-called "assault rifles" and voted consistently against such bans. Most recently he opposed an amendment to extend a ban on 19 specific firearms, and others with similar characteristics.

Gun Locks--
John McCain believes that every firearms owner has a responsibility to learn how to safely use and store the firearm they have chosen, whether for target shooting, hunting, or personal protection. He has supported legislation requiring gun manufacturers to include gun safety devices such as trigger locks in product packaging.

Banning Ammunition--
John McCain believes that banning ammunition is just another way to undermine Second Amendment rights. He voted against an amendment that would have banned many of the most commonly used hunting cartridges on the spurious grounds that they were "armor-piercing."

So to recap, McCain against AWB, Obama for AWB. I don't care what McCain may have said in 2000... right now he's saying no AWB.

Saying Obama is more pro gun than McCain is just asinine.