 |
07-10-06, 03:40 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 29
|
4-Runner Reliability
Guys, I've been in the market for a while and on these boards looking at 80-Series Land Cruisers, but I wanted to get some insight about 4-Runners from any owners (esp. if you have both a 4-runner and a Cruiser).
How have your experiences been with reliability? Maintenance and cost of ownership? I don't know much about the 4-runner engines.
I'm looking at some 98-01 models around Austin.
|
|
|
07-10-06, 04:04 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
250+ Club
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 957
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jeffreyprince
Guys, I've been in the market for a while and on these boards looking at 80-Series Land Cruisers, but I wanted to get some insight about 4-Runners from any owners (esp. if you have both a 4-runner and a Cruiser).
How have your experiences been with reliability? Maintenance and cost of ownership? I don't know much about the 4-runner engines.
I'm looking at some 98-01 models around Austin.
|
That's the third gen 4Runner.
They run the 5VZ-FE v6 and the 3RZ-FE I4.
Both are awesome motors.
You can't go wrong either way.
Reliability is excellent.
It's a Toyota!!!
__________________
James Henry
Wasatch Cruisers
TLCA 11233
76 FJ40 'SeldomSeen'
91 VZN130 'CanOWorms'
|
|
|
07-10-06, 05:48 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 157
|
i second that,i've got 97 runner with 120K miles,still runs perfect,also have a 91 runner with 302k miles on it,its weak but still runs pretty good,its in storage now for my son turning 16 next year,i too am looking for an 80 series crusher for myself
|
|
|
07-10-06, 05:52 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Site Addict
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Upstate
Posts: 1,267
|
I had two of those. Drove them cross country and back several times.
The ONLY things I ever did was some transmission sensor (needed a screwdriver to install) and a throttle position sensor.....also needed only a screwdriver, both were diagnosed using codes...
Hard to go wrong as long as it has been taken care of.
No worries.
__________________
94 FZJ80.....ARB, OME, Revo'd, Eclipsed and Locked.
86 FJ60: Sold!
|
|
|
07-10-06, 06:05 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
250+ Club
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 957
|
A buddy of mins has a 1997 with a 4 cylinder and a 5 spd that he bought new off the lot.
He's got over 275,000 miles on it
Still runs as strong as the day he bought it, and to say he's beaten the SHIT out of it is an understatement.
__________________
James Henry
Wasatch Cruisers
TLCA 11233
76 FJ40 'SeldomSeen'
91 VZN130 'CanOWorms'
|
|
|
07-10-06, 06:14 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Site Addict
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rolla, MO (UMR)
Posts: 1,988
|
i personally think that the 4runner could be Toyota's #1 vehicle overall. The cruisers are nice, i like them alot too.....but the 4runners especially the 1st gen(84-~89) where great. A good driver could take a stock 4runner anywhere they wanted just like the 40 series. In fact i thought i read somewhere that the 4runner was invented to replace the 40 series here in america(not sure about that though).
The later 4runners i have very little knowledge on becaue i have never driven any. I expect them to be reliable just like all other toytas and will give you close to 300k miles withoutmuch fuss, just routine maintenece.
lunyou
|
|
|
07-12-06, 11:32 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Site Addict
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,733
|
I had a first gen 87 turbo 4R A/T(IFS) and now own a 94 FJ80 and added a supercharger. I liked both for different reasons. If you do off roading, the 80 is big, as in yuge. The 4R would go almost anywhere you could fit a jeep, the LC is a more capable in terms of traction (dual solid axles vs IFS front), but it is too big to be much more than a rock climber (IMO).
For towing and hauling, the LC wins hands down. I regularly tow/ed a tandem axle trailer with both, the 4R worked a LOT harder. The 4R turbo had more pep and go than my LC, but the supercharger seemed to have taken care of that.
Really, you can't go wrong with either one, and it really depends on what you are going to do with it. For offroad ability, I'd go 4R, for street, comfort and towing, the LC wins. During my overlap year with the two, I would grab the keys to the LC more often than the 4R. With all the NWOR toys to reinforce the front end (skid plate, control arm stress bar), the 4R was a stiffer chassis, but the ride has always gone to the LC.
HTH
Scott Justusson
'94 FZJ80 Supercharged
ex:
87 4Runner turbo A/T
|
|
|
07-15-06, 07:44 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
total rice
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: bring lawyers guns & money
Posts: 3,336
|
I asked the same question and here's the link
__________________
1975 FJ40 - V8, 4WDB, Saginaw PS, SR, 4" lift w/ 33X12.50X15 BFG MTR's, M8000 ROTW
2007 4 Runner SR5 4WD - stone stock daily driver
TLCA#10793
"The advent of the internet has permitted stupid people to propagate their stupidity WAY too easily, all with a position of self-proclaimed authority preying on peoples' ignorance or stupidity. Everyone with a keyboard is an expert." UNKNOWN
|
|
|
07-16-06, 11:32 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hudson NC
Posts: 33
|
1stgen runners kick ass. I've had two of them and they have been lots of fun..
__________________
85 runner EFI...34"s and some dents
I want an FJ62
|
|
|
07-16-06, 11:39 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Shankapotamus
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: yer mom
Posts: 1,117
|
I have a 98 4runner Limited... awesome, never had any problems, 138K miles. Put brakes on it 5K ago, flush and fill tranny, both diffs, radiator, etc. Drive it forever. V6 can get better than 25MPG if you're careful with it. I routinely get better than 20.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shahram
If I call my Land Cruiser a "space shuttle", will it keep us from burning up in a ball of molten metal when my buddies and I re-enter Earth's orbit after a camping trip on Planet X?
|
1998 4Runner Limited
1976 FJ40 Bugly, TBI 2F,4 speed, toybox, minitruck t-case, 418:1, 3 link, 4 link, coils, HP 60, 14 bolt, ARBs, caged, 42" IROKs
1964 FJ45SWB SOA,SR,383SBC,SM465,NP203/205,ARBs,Longfield Inners & Outers,36"Swampers,Caged eternal project
Hoosier Cruisers
|
|
|
09-28-09, 01:38 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: cottondale (tuscaloosa) alabama
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LukeZero
I have a 98 4runner Limited... awesome, never had any problems, 138K miles. Put brakes on it 5K ago, flush and fill tranny, both diffs, radiator, etc. Drive it forever. V6 can get better than 25MPG if you're careful with it. I routinely get better than 20.
|
iv been looking for a 1st gen for a while (just need to sell the jetta so i can have cash in hand) im looking @ a 4cyl b/c of mileage but iv never seen anyone claim more than 22 even w/the 4banger
is your v6 2wd?? or are you just really good at keeping your right foot under control??
(any kinda computer chips/mods/ fuel upgrades anything like that at all done to it??) hell if i could get 18mpg out of a 6cyl id opt for that over the 4cyl any day!
(and while i have everyone elses attention as well) is the 3.0 found in the 1st and 2nd gens really all that bad?? iv heard it goes through headgaskets and that it gets the mileage of a v8 w/the power of a 4cyl, i drove a 95 3.0 once and it didnt seem to have any get up and go (i was comparing it to a honda passport 3.2 v6 which i LOVED! if i could find another one id love to have another one.... oh the things i took for granted in my youth.... all she needed was a water pump...  )
__________________
"Every generation needs a new revolution." Thomas Jefferson
i cling to my Faith and my guns
1980 fj40 WTB: roll cage, OEM softop (and bows) original front seats fold down tailgate
http://tuscaloosa.craigslist.org/cto/1479222960.html
help a college kid start to use his LandCruiser for a DD 
|
|
|
09-28-09, 08:59 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Oh nevermind......
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Yreka, CA
Posts: 5,166
|
The early V6's 88-89 were not under the head gasket recall like the later ones, but if you're not a mechanic you may not want one. They are underpowered, there's not a lot of mods for them because most prefer the 4 cylinder... They are torquier than the 4, and that can be fun!
|
|
|
09-28-09, 10:26 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
250+ Club
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N. California
Posts: 347
|
Come on, its a Toyota... do you really need to ask??
Really though, the only 4runner motor to avoid is the 3.0 v6, which was long gone by the model years you are considering.
|
|
|
09-29-09, 08:35 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 34
|
I have had my 93 4 runner 3.0 slow they call it for over ten years, all I have done is keep the oil and fluids changed, minor brake stuff the usual maintnance and love it, almost 200,000 and still going, fast no, but I know if I have to go 4 low it will go any where. Lots of room for gear and family, no complaints.
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|