ntsqd
technerd
This thread: https://forum.ih8mud.com/60-series-wagons/496481-chevy-63-questions.html got me to wondering about something I've known intuitively, but had no idea what the magnitude of it might be.
Shackle angle plays too much of a role in actual effective spring rate to make a blanket statement about spring rate when only the rate of the spring itself is known. Say the rate of the spring is 500 lbs per inch, and for simplicity's sake let's assume that the eye to eye distance increases by 1/4" with the first inch of spring compression. (I'm using the 1/4" number as a guess and to have at least something to work with. It may be more and it may be less.) In the below I'm using a 6" long shackle and considering one side only.
If the shackle were not having any effect then putting 500 lbs on a 500 lbs/in rated spring would compress it 1 inch.
With an at-rest shackle angle of 30* from vertical we put 500 lbs on the frame. The frame will move down 1.160" due to the swing of the shackle with the 1/4" spring lengthening assumption. That makes the effective spring rate 431 lbs/in.
With an at-rest shackle angle of 45* from vertical we put 500 lbs on the frame. The frame will move down 1.284" due to the swing of the shackle with the 1/4" spring lengthening assumption. That makes the effective spring rate 389 lbs/in.
With an at-rest shackle angle of 60* from vertical we put 500 lbs on the frame. The frame will move down 1.557" due to the swing of the shackle with the 1/4" spring lengthening assumption. That makes the effective spring rate 321 lbs/in.
Shackle angle plays too much of a role in actual effective spring rate to make a blanket statement about spring rate when only the rate of the spring itself is known. Say the rate of the spring is 500 lbs per inch, and for simplicity's sake let's assume that the eye to eye distance increases by 1/4" with the first inch of spring compression. (I'm using the 1/4" number as a guess and to have at least something to work with. It may be more and it may be less.) In the below I'm using a 6" long shackle and considering one side only.
If the shackle were not having any effect then putting 500 lbs on a 500 lbs/in rated spring would compress it 1 inch.
With an at-rest shackle angle of 30* from vertical we put 500 lbs on the frame. The frame will move down 1.160" due to the swing of the shackle with the 1/4" spring lengthening assumption. That makes the effective spring rate 431 lbs/in.
With an at-rest shackle angle of 45* from vertical we put 500 lbs on the frame. The frame will move down 1.284" due to the swing of the shackle with the 1/4" spring lengthening assumption. That makes the effective spring rate 389 lbs/in.
With an at-rest shackle angle of 60* from vertical we put 500 lbs on the frame. The frame will move down 1.557" due to the swing of the shackle with the 1/4" spring lengthening assumption. That makes the effective spring rate 321 lbs/in.
Last edited: