 |
07-03-09, 02:24 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
250+ Club
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Billings, Montana / Cody, Wyoming
Posts: 316
|
Rear Axle FJ60 vs F250
Had rear outer axle seals leaking on both my vehicles, decided to fix them both today. I own a '83 FJ60 (semi floating rear axle) and a '92 Ford F250 Diesel w/ full floating rear axle. The 60 axle was just as big in diameter as the F250. Sometimes (me at least) we need a little reminders of why we dump so much money into these old rigs. I love my 60!
__________________
Thanks
-Wyo
 1983 FJ60
|
|
|
07-03-09, 04:03 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 158
|
I hate to burst your bubble but you can't really directly compare axle size between a semi and full floating setup, semi floating have to handle not only the drive torque but also the load from the wheel, a full floating axle only has to transmit the drive torque, the hub bearings handle the load.
__________________
1983 BJ42 LX
Everything old is reliable
Everything new is unreliable
Until there is something newer. In which case that which was new and unreliable has now become old and reliable. Makes perfect sense don't it.
|
|
|
07-03-09, 06:08 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
250+ Club
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Billings, Montana / Cody, Wyoming
Posts: 316
|
Can I compare it to my '84 CJ7 then?
__________________
Thanks
-Wyo
 1983 FJ60
|
|
|
07-03-09, 06:15 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lincoln, CA
Posts: 108
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyomingben
Can I compare it to my '84 CJ7 then?
|
Is there a comparison? About 10 years ago before I bought my Cruiser I was lookin at Jeeps too. I did my homework and realized that the components under the Toyota's were about twice the size of everything on the Jeeps.
My justification for my decision came when my buddy with a Jeep crawled under my tank and just kept saying, "OMG look at the size of this and that".
__________________
84 FJ60 "LC THE BROWN COW"; 33's, SR, 3 1/2in Spector springs, H55, Marks 3:1 t-case gears, Bull bar, Warn 9000i, sliders, rear bump & qtr protection, Rear ARB'd, 200amp Mean Green, duel Yellow Tops, lots of electronics, orig paint, and zero rust.
Trucks fixed, I'm broke.
|
|
|
07-03-09, 07:42 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2009
Location: australia
Posts: 45
|
in australia there is a common saying that the 60 is the toughest leaf sprung vehicle TOYOTA ever made. i have the 61, and i don't know of any other 4wd that comes with a laminated front diff from the factory, in australia anyway. its one downfall would have to be the rust, but it is 23 years old and with front and rear lockers, 35" tyres and that wonderful 12ht turbo diesel, i drive it just about anywhere
i reckon dints add character
|
|
|
07-04-09, 12:48 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Site Addict
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: So. CA
Posts: 1,682
|
I can vouch for the FF rear axle shaft being approximately the same OD as the semi-float rear axle shaft. Every new project on my 60 I find something else that impresses me. Why didn't I buy one sooner?
__________________
My opinion is worth what you paid me for it.
|
|
|
07-04-09, 04:52 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 158
|
A common saying about the 60 series being the toughest toyota??? I must of missed that one. I'm not sure how a saying like that would have started considering that the same basic drivetrain is in the late 40, 60 & early 70 series (with a few exceptions). Seeing that all of these models are very similar I think you'd be spilting hairs in trying to determine the "toughest".
__________________
1983 BJ42 LX
Everything old is reliable
Everything new is unreliable
Until there is something newer. In which case that which was new and unreliable has now become old and reliable. Makes perfect sense don't it.
|
|
|
07-04-09, 09:17 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: downtown canada, vancouver island
Posts: 124
|
one way to find out
who's got a stocker in all categories thats willing to go beat the crap outta them until the last ones standing.
the 80 series have bigger birfs up front but have the smaller 8" ring gear. the rear, disc brakes and fully/ semi floating axles.
did 40 series ever come with power steering? that could be an issue.
wheel base of the 60 will get hung up more than a 40.
all i know is that i've owned a 40 and a 60 and they both kicked some serious assssss
|
|
|
07-04-09, 12:41 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Lifer
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,442
|
If you insist on domestic rears....go with a Dana 60.
If you will be going 38's or bigger with lockers or with a v-8 and hitting the rocks real hard.....go domestic Dana 60...14 bolt.
If you are not doing any of the above.....stay Toyota Maybe even go with Poly performance rear axles.
|
|
|
07-04-09, 03:26 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: FT Collins, Co
Posts: 216
|
"the 60 will get hung up more than the 40" Maybe and maybe not. Longer wheelbases have their advantages, and the rear axle shafts in the 60/62 series are larger diameter than the 40s....
__________________
"To invent something, all you need is a good imagination and a pile of junk" -Thomas Edison
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|