View Single Post
Old 04-25-08, 04:58 AM   #11
DMX84
IH8MUD Addict
 
DMX84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sandia Park, New Mexico
Posts: 867
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim_Chow View Post
I also think it's mainly increased frontal surface area, which includes the front between the bumper and the ground. Best way to increase fuel economy would be to drive 55-60mph on cruise or lower the vehicle. Best way for the latter would be one of those JDM AHC controllers that allows one to drop/raise the front/rear independently of one another in 10mm increments. The new LX basically does this (drops the vehicle at highway speed by a fixed amount, the front drops more than the rear) to regain some lost mpg's due to the increased engine displacement.
I disagree with the driving with the cruise control on. I’ve gotten worse using the cruise due to the cruise hammering the throttle to increase/maintain speed. But maybe its better at 55-60, I don’t know, I have never driven at that speed with cruise on.
~DMX


__________________
I may be vile and pernicious But you can't look away
I make you think I'm delicious With the stuff that I say
I am the best you can get Have you guessed me yet?
I am the slime oozin' out From your TV set"

I'm The Slime by Frank Zappa, 1973

98 Land Cruiser
01 Beta trials bike
71 GMC Shortwide truck
DMX84 is offline   Reply With Quote