View Single Post
Old 04-17-08, 12:59 PM   #20
LandCruisers4Life
IH8MUD Lifer
 
LandCruisers4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas
TLCA# 16244
Posts: 1,525
Quote:
Originally Posted by SWUtah View Post
Also who is going to take a $70K vehicle anywhere that the 200 series is capable of going. The new LC makes sense like the 100 series does after it is around 4-5 years old and has depreciated $40K
If I don't pay my 100 off early, it will cost me the same as a new one. I plan on paying off early. So, in essense, I am taking a $70K vehicle off road right now. I bought it for exploring, not just driving on pavement. I think there are some who will definitely modify their 200 for off roading as well. The vehicle was designed to be used off road, and to ride in comfort doing so. I think the 200 is too large, yes. I felt the 100 is really maxed out what I would want in an off road vehicle.

To compare the Sequoia to a Land Cruiser, well there is just nothing to compare. The Land Cruiser is an off road vehicle, and the Sequoia is a mini-van in disguise.


__________________
2004 UZJ100 "El Rinoceronte" - Gotta pay to play...
LandCruisers4Life is offline   Reply With Quote