Quote:
Originally Posted by Sputnik40
This is like watching the 90's progression of MTB suspension ideas getting hashed out. There were tons of well meaning or potentially functional options running around, 90% of which were unrealistic due to excessive weight. I think the same applies here - good to see some different ideas, but in the end it's not weight that's gonna kill most of them - but simplicity. That being said - I think Mace is right: The rear 4-link is King due to simplicity. I for one am going that route - as I'm kinda slow skilled, can do anything, just takes forever  .
Just my .02 cents - continue on  . |
You are right dude.
-4-links are simple
-4-links are light
(but they are boring.  )
I am hoping to be able to build me equipment that will be comparitive in weight to a 4-link system. 
__________________
Thanks friend but I'm not calculating anything. Im just going on the "if I can get it to fit" calculator
You don't need adaptor plates. That's what gaffer tape was invented for.
|