If I didn't know any better, I'd say you were getting a bit snippy.....understandable when your talking yourself in circles.
Fact 1.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Huhwhye
If I go to a 32" vs stock 31" tire what will be the effect
|
You said stock 31" which is not a BFG AT on any Toyota
Fact 2.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Huhwhye
My friend has an '04 Taco with an auto. He had 75 series Revo's and lost MPG compared to the heavier 70 series BFG's
|
Your friend has an 04 Taco, and has gone from OEM tires to BFG AT's to Revos in 3 years???? "70 series BFG's" would presumably be the stock tires on the truck, which are not AT's. But if you say he's gone through 3 sets of tires in 3 years, including a set of BFG AT's in stock size after the OEM BFG's, so be it.
Fact 3.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jacket
If you go from a 31" passenger tire to a 32" LT, 8 ply tire, then the extra weight to turn 4 of those tires will have some burden on your MPG, probably 1-2 (adjusted) mpg less.
|
What I said is indisputably true, and is based off of Fact 1 where you stated you were going from
stock to 32".
You can try and spin this into a BFG AT versus other AT argument all you like, but that's not how you began this thread. No one is disputing the size of a BFG AT tire here, but if that's what you'd like to do, feel free - its your thread. My posts still stand - indisputable.