Quote:
Originally Posted by MichiganChapter?
I'm not certain that I understand the last sentance.
What position has your club taken on this along with (more importantly) the TLCA?....The BRC?... The NOHVCC?
What I'm getting at here is the same concept argued previously with nothing but attacks:
Question:
is there any national off-road group in the country willing to take a PUBLICLY HELD position on any of the important issues which affect us each and every day.
If your club or any of these hear/speak/see no evil 'non-profits' are willing to finally stick their necks out hereon this inevitable subject of pay-to-play...so be it and congratulations for standing up/acting like a man or woman should regarding what it truly costs to wheel.
Yet if these groups choose to turn their heads on these type of subjects over the very real threat of risking membership renewals (see supporting groups like the AMA and their helmet|(less) 'rights' or me-only-and-forever single-track-trail policies) then why should anybody in the orv community support them?
Please give us some more info as to what is to be done with this money and how restoration/maintenance is is being funded at proper levels presently without it so that we may better understand your last line above.
Thank you.
|
And this point/agument/tirade spreads. We may need a "The Ultimate Clubs Holding A Public Land Use Stance Debate" thread.
I'll be back to summarize in a few dozen posts.